We will know today whether these key moments in the UK election campaign impacted on how people voted Boris Johnson and Jeremy Corbyn are poor options and each has had a few awkward campaign moments that may have influenced the election, writes.
At stake in the UK election is Brexit in all its horrible complexity.
Then there’s the question of how big a role the state should play in British people’s lives and the nation’s economy.
Together, these will place a much heavier burden than usual on the next prime minister.
Yet, if this election had been hard to predict, it’s partly because voters saw the main contenders for No 10 Downing Street as deeply flawed.
In weeks of staged speeches, stiff debates, and pre-cooked photo ops, the campaign also contained unscripted moments, which resonated emotionally with voters.
Mainly, they seemed to confirm the worst fears that Boris Johnson is heartless and untrustworthy, and Jeremy Corbyn is toxic and out of touch.
I’ve picked out five that were particularly revealing.
The hospital photo
This is likely to be the enduring image of the campaign, if Johnson is denieda parliamentary majority or if it’s smaller than expected.
On Sunday, the Yorkshire Evening Post published a story about a four-year-old boy lying sick on the floor of an overcrowded hospital in Leeds.
When ITV reporter Joe Pike tried to show Johnson the photo on his phone, Johnson repeatedly refused to look at it and, instead, blustered through with his talking points.
It reminded many of the public awkwardness of Johnson’s predecessor, Theresa May, but she never would have done what Johnson did next — he grabbed Pike’s mobile phone.
Tried to show @BorisJohnson the picture of Jack Williment-Barr. The 4-year-old with suspected pneumonia forced to lie on a pile of coats on the floor of a Leeds hospital.— Joe Pike (@joepike) December 9, 2019
The PM grabbed my phone and put it in his pocket: @itvcalendar | #GE19 pic.twitter.com/hv9mk4xrNJ
Only after Pike mentioned, on camera, that his phone was in the prime minister’s coat pocket did Johnson sheepishly withdraw it, glance at the photo, and stammer through an apology to the family, before returning to his theme.
Campaigns are long and tiring; nerves fray and the best politicians have bad moments.
But Johnson could hardly have picked a more fitting way to demonstrate the lack of empathy of which he’s often accused, or remind many that there’s something of the bully about him.
The terrorist attack
Such moments of trauma demand both firmness and humanity from a leader.
Boris Johnson’s quickness to pin the London Bridge attacker’s release from prison on a Labour government policy started an unseemly blame game that reduced complex issues to sordid campaign soundbites.
Johnson even seemed to criticise the very prisoner rehabilitation programme for which Jack Merritt, one of the young victims, gave his life that day.
Normally, the Tories benefit from a focus on security.
But Jack’s father, Dave Merritt, said his son would have been livid at the way his death was “being used to perpetuate an agenda of hate that he gave his everything to fight against”.
Johnson never even called the family to offer his condolences.
Mr Meritt’s dignified and forceful interventions, including a TV interview, will have struck many as a reminder that, for Johnson, everything is political.
Not all of the campaign’s unscripted moments broke against Johnson. Three others did, perhaps, terminal damage to Jeremy Corbyn’s hopes.
The leaked conversation
Labour health secretary Jon Ashworth was often heard challenging the Tories on health care and pushing his party’s key campaign message that only Labour could be relied upon to adequately support the National Health Service.
But in a leaked phone call with a Tory activist friend, Ashworth suggested it was a mistake to have made Corbyn party leader.
Worse, he echoed the fears of many that Corbyn, whose anti-West foreign policy views are highly unconventional, would be a danger in office.
Ashworth later said the leaks made him “look like a right plonker” and insisted he was merely trying to misdirect his friend and make him feel complacent.
It was damaging to Corbyn, nonetheless.
The Labour vote is, as Number Cruncher Politics’s Matt Singh wrote on Wednesday, “softer” than the Conservative one.
If Corbyn’s own inner circle have doubts about his fitness for office, then how much less sure of their choice are many voters?
The leak also took the focus away from Labour’s health care message at precisely the wrong time, though Johnson’s foot-in-mouth (or phone-in-pocket) NHS incident helped cushion the impact.
When the UK’s chief rabbi, Ephraim Mirvis, took the rare step of wading into an election campaign, with a biting article in the Times, it was impossible not to notice.
Antisemitism, he said, had become an institutional problem within the Labour Party and was “incompatible with the British values of which we are so proud — of dignity and respect for all people”.
This was a cri de coeur from a topreligious leader and an appeal to all decent people to take into account —indeed, be guided by — Corbyn’s poor record on antisemitism when they vote.
It may have lost Corbyn the support of many moderates.
The Andrew Neil interview
Nobody expects to emerge unscathed from a sit-down with the best interviewer in British television, Andrew Neil, a forensic take-down artist.
But Corbyn didn’t just struggle in his 30-minute interview with Neil; he withered.
It wasn’t just the long segmenton antisemitism, in which Corbyn inexplicably refused multiple times to apologise for his party’s behaviour.
On every subject, Corbyn struggled to answer the questions and defend his policies.
He was particularly weak in explaining how he would pay for Labour’s radical spending plans without destroying the country’s tax base. (Although, at least Corbyn put himself through the ordeal; Johnson refused the Neil offer, even though all the other party leaders were grilled by him).
Parties are paramount in UK politics, of course; this isn’t a presidential election.
No apology to the Jewish community from Jeremy Corbyn, as he is repeatedly challenged over claims of anti-Semitism within the Labour Party— BBC Politics (@BBCPolitics) November 26, 2019
[Tap to expand] https://t.co/ewcGeo7yOY pic.twitter.com/L1z52YZ9eu
But leaders matter. They set the economic and foreign policy agenda, and the tone of public discourse.
They represent the country on the world stage and embody it for international investors.
Ideally, they should have integrity and competence, be likable and trustworthy.
With Johnson, voters at least have the knowledge that a political chameleon changes.
Corbyn’s dogmatism, by contrast, defines him.
Spare a moment for British voters — this has been anunhappy choice.