No evidence to show cartoons were bogus
Ryle Dwyer tells us these three cartoons never appeared in the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten, and that these three bogus images were obviously included in the booklet in order to cause real offence, unlike the other 12 cartoons which, he says, would be unlikely to offend anyone.
But did the imams ever claim that the extra three images had been published by Jyllands-Posten? And were these images really bogus and only included deliberately to inflame Middle Eastern Muslim opinion, as your columnist suggested?
