Letters to the Editor: Teachers should reject proposed changes to the senior cycle

As the Association of Secondary Teachers Ireland (ASTI) ballots its members, a teacher outlines why he thinks the 'flawed reform' should be rejected
A reader's long list of reasons for rejecting the proposed changes include the 'flawed reform' of AACcs (additional assessment components), the use of AI (artificial intelligence), and 'forced declarations of union membership'. Picture: iStock 

A reader's long list of reasons for rejecting the proposed changes include the 'flawed reform' of AACcs (additional assessment components), the use of AI (artificial intelligence), and 'forced declarations of union membership'. Picture: iStock 

As a teacher who entered the profession in 2013, I have spent my career watching unions trade the long-term professional standing of their members for “easy” wins that offer little substance.

We are now being asked to accept the updated senior cycle redevelopment implementation support measures and its latest addendum. Before accepting these measures, teachers must look at the reality of what is being offered.

You have reached your article limit. Already a subscriber? Sign in

185 years of the Irish Examiner

185th
Anniversary Offer

Six months of digital access for €18.50

No obligation. Ts&Cs apply.

More in this section

Revoiced

Newsletter

Had a busy week? Sign up for some of the best reads from the week gone by. Selected just for you.

Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited