‘Torture’ debate re-ignites over source of tip-off
One of the key sources for initial information about an al-Qaida “courier” who led US authorities to bin Laden’s Pakistani hideout was Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the al-Qaida operative said to have masterminded the September 11, 2001, attacks, a former US national security official said.
KSM, as he was known to US officials, was subjected to “waterboarding” 183 times, the US government has acknowledged.
But it was not until later, after waterboarding was suspended because it and other harsh techniques became heatedly debated, that Mohammed told interrogators about the existence of a courier particularly close to bin Laden, a fragmentary tip that touched off a years-long manhunt that ended in bin Laden’s death at the hands of US special forces on Sunday.
And at the time the information surfaced, the CIA had already abandoned some of its most controversial interrogation techniques, including waterboarding, in which water is poured over the face of an interrogation subject to simulate drowning, current and former US officials said.
But the possibility that detainees who at some point were subjected to physical coercion later gave up information leading to bin Laden’s discovery is sparking discussion among intelligence experts as to whether he could have been found without them.
“It will re-ignite a debate that hasn’t gone away about the morality and the ethics of certain techniques,” said Richard Haas, president of the Council on Foreign Relations.
“Waterboarding” and other physically coercive interrogation techniques used on detained militants, including depriving them of sleep, making them pose in uncomfortable positions, and slamming them into walls, were authorised by President George W Bush in the wake of the September 11 attacks.
The tactics were used on detainees held by the CIA at secret prisons outside the United States.
In 2004, the CIA suspended these techniques.
Veterans of the Bush administration were quick to claim credit for the torture-like techniques, which President Barack Obama banned soon after taking office in 2009.
Paul Wolfowitz, Bush’s deputy defence secretary, said the successful operation against bin Laden showed the value of the Bush administration’s interrogation policies.
“I think it ... rested heavily on some of those controversial policies,” Wolfowitz said.
“This would not have been possible if we were releasing terrorists willy-nilly and not keeping them for the information they had, some of which often may not look that important, like the pseudonym of a driver, until it turns out that he’s really a critical person,” Wolfowitz said.
But former US officials told of a sequence of events that raises questions about whether the enhanced interrogation means played a significant role in bin Laden’s capture.
A former US counter-terrorism official who was briefed on detainee information about bin Laden and his entourage said, for instance, the CIA stopped using harsh interrogation methods on KSM after 2003.
But the first key intelligence reports identifying the al-Qaida courier reached US counter-terrorism officials in 2004, according to a former US national security official with direct personal knowledge.
The official said that for three years after the CIA stopped subjecting him to coercive measures, KSM continued to talk extensively. It was during this period, the official said, that he believes KSM gave up information about the courier.
A second former US official said that while he did not remember which detainee gave up the key tip about the courier, he confirmed that the information came in 2004, after the CIA had abandoned waterboarding but before it had completely stopped the use of physically stressful techniques.
Obama Administration officials confirmed that US intelligence did not learn the identity of the courier until after the CIA interrogation programme was terminated.
CONNECT WITH US TODAY
Be the first to know the latest news and updates
