Jury out in 'emotive' Redknapp trial
Jurors at the Harry Redknapp tax evasion trial retired today to consider their verdicts.
The eight men and four women were warned to ignore footballing matters during their deliberations.
Judge Anthony Leonard told the jury to forget about the âemotive subjectâ as it decides the fate of Tottenham manager Redknapp and co-defendant Milan Mandaric, his former boss at Portsmouth.
The judge said at Southwark Crown Court: âFootball is an emotive subject, stirring in an individual anything from deep passion to resentment.
âIt has become so commercial that it may be thought by some to have lost its way.â
But the judge added in his summing-up: âThis case is not about football but about allegations of tax fraud.â
The judge told jurors he will only take a unanimous verdict.
The Crown says deposits totalling ÂŁ189,000 in a Monaco account were bonuses related to Portsmouth Football Club.
At least one of the payments was related to the ÂŁ3 million profit the club made on the sale of England striker Peter Crouch to Aston Villa, Southwark Crown Court heard.
Jurors were warned by the prosecution to âkeep their eyes on the ballâ when they consider their verdicts.
But Redknappâs barrister, John Kelsey-Fry QC, said yesterday that some of the Crownâs evidence is ârepugnant to all our basic instincts of fairnessâ.
Mandaricâs QC, Lord Macdonald, said the prosecution was âreally flailingâ with âpaper-thinâ explanations for the Monaco payments.
âWe say the evidence against him is hopelessly weak,â he said.
Both Redknapp, 64, of Poole, Dorset, and Mandaric, 73, from Oadby, Leicestershire, deny two counts of cheating the public revenue when Redknapp was manager of Portsmouth Football Club.
The first charge of cheating the public revenue alleges that between April 1 2002 and November 28 2007 Mandaric paid 145,000 US dollars (ÂŁ93,100) into the account.
The second charge for the same offence relates to a sum of 150,000 US dollars (ÂŁ96,300) allegedly paid between May 1 2004 and November 28 2007.



