Supreme Court dismisses Gemma O'Doherty and John Waters' Covid-19 measures challenge

Ms O'Doherty had argued that the measures were taken over a virus that was "no different to the common cold".
In their action, Gemma O'Doherty (left) and John Waters (right) had challenged legislation including the 2020 Health Preservation and Protection and Other Emergency Measures in the Public Interest Act; the 2020 Emergency Measures in the Public Interest Act Covid-19 Act and the 1947 Health Act (Affected Areas) Order. File picture: Collins Courts

In their action, Gemma O'Doherty (left) and John Waters (right) had challenged legislation including the 2020 Health Preservation and Protection and Other Emergency Measures in the Public Interest Act; the 2020 Emergency Measures in the Public Interest Act Covid-19 Act and the 1947 Health Act (Affected Areas) Order. File picture: Collins Courts

The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a decision to dismiss Gemma O’Doherty and John Waters' challenge to the constitutionality of laws introduced in response to the Covid-19 pandemic.

In a six-to-one majority decision the Supreme Court's ruling brings to an end a controversial legal action before the Irish courts that commenced shortly after the State introduced various regulations, restrictions, and measures in response to the Covid-19 pandemic over two years ago.

You have reached your article limit. Already a subscriber? Sign in

185 years of the Irish Examiner

185th
Anniversary Offer

Six months of digital access for €18.50

No obligation. Ts&Cs apply.

More in this section

Lunchtime News

Newsletter

Get a lunch briefing straight to your inbox at noon daily. Also be the first to know with our occasional Breaking News emails.

Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited