Rule favoured boys whose fathers were past pupils

YESTERDAY’S circuit court ruling hinged on the school’s “parental rule”, which favoured boys who had a parent who previously attended the school.

Rule favoured boys whose fathers were past pupils

John Stokes, 13, and his mother Mary Stokes argued that, because of the historic unlikelihood of Travellers attending any secondary school, this indirectly discriminated against the Travelling community.

While neither John’s father or any of his siblings went beyond primary education, his mother did. “Unusually, within the Travelling community,” Judge Tom Teehan said in his judgement, “she and all of her sisters and some of her brothers received secondary education.”

You have reached your article limit. Already a subscriber? Sign in

Unlimited access starts here.

Try from only €0.25 a day.

Cancel anytime

More in this section

Lunchtime News

Newsletter

Get a lunch briefing straight to your inbox at noon daily. Also be the first to know with our occasional Breaking News emails.

Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited