Bordering on confusion: Why we mustn't forget history and our conflicting identities

Bordering on confusion: Why we mustn't forget history and our conflicting identities

By providing a benign shelter for conflicting identities, the European Union helped end the Troubles in the North. To forget this is to risk a return to the past. ‘Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it’ is a warning from history that should not be forgotten, says Roisin McAuley.

Growing up Catholic in the North, I had no doubt that I was Irish. I have an Irish name. An early memory is learning to write my full name as Gaeilge.

At my Catholic primary school, I learned Irish, céilidh dancing, and the Irish national anthem. I recited poems in Irish at feiseanna in predominantly Catholic towns.

However, I also recited poems in English and danced ballet at festivals in predominantly Protestant towns.

At my convent boarding school, thanks to the North’s examination syllabus, my education was largely English. Ireland was a mere footnote in the history of England and the empire.

We learned the geography of Britain, not Ireland. I read, and learned to love, Chaucer, Shakespeare, Keats, Wordsworth, Shelley, Austen, Dickens, Hopkins, and Eliots George and TS.

I can still recite English monarchs from the Tudors to the present day. However, each year we had an inter-house Irish dancing competition, we learned Irish, and, during some summer school holidays, we went to an Irish language college in the Donegal Gaeltacht.

At home, we listened to both the BBC and Raidió Éireann (‘Athlone’ on the wireless dial). My father read the quintessentially English magazine, The Field, and the robustly anti-unionist commentator, Claud Gordon, in The Sunday Press.

I read the Greyfriars books about Billy Bunter, Bob Cherry, and Hurree Jamset Ram Singh; the Malory Towers and the Chalet School girls’ series; the Biggles and Worralls stories by Captain WE Johns. I can still recite the opening sentences of The Wind in the Willows by Kenneth Grahame.

My English husband and his sisters, growing up in Surrey, read the same books. But they belonged to that culture. I did not.

British or Irish?

Before the partition of Ireland in 1921, unionist Protestants such as Edward Carson, who led violent resistance to Home Rule being granted to all of Ireland, described themselves as Irish, much as unionists in Scotland today proudly claim their Scottish identity.

After partition, unionists in the North came to describe themselves as British. Nationalists still described themselves as Irish.

The North became a forgotten backwater overseen by the same sub-section of the British Home Office that dealt with the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man, in a portfolio that included pigeon racing, British summer time, the protection of animals and birds and the administration of state-owned pubs.

There were two main political parties based on religion and attitudes to partition. Catholics voted for the Nationalist Party. Protestants voted for the Unionist Party. The Northern Ireland Labour Party had a negligible presence.

In 1962, the IRA ended a six-year border campaign, citing the lack of support from Catholic nationalists, who seemed to have accepted their unwilling inclusion in a Protestant state for a Protestant people, comprising six counties of the nine-county province of Ulster — these six counties being the largest land area that could be guaranteed a Protestant majority.

Nationalists called the state ‘the Six Counties’. Unionists, ignoring counties Cavan, Monaghan, and Donegal, called it Ulster. The official name of the state was, and is, Northern Ireland.

“Where tongues lie coiled, as under flames lie wicks

Where half of us, as in a wooden horse

Were cabin’d and combined like wily Greeks

Besieged within the siege, whispering morse.”

— Seamus Heaney

North No surrender

Northern Irish prime minister Basil Brooke was intransigent in his exclusion of Catholics in public life and even from working on his estate. He castigated the taoiseach, Seán Lemass, for having the temerity to suggest the Common Market, which the UK and Ireland had applied to join, would make the border in Ireland irrelevant.

Brooke was succeeded in 1963 by Terence O’Neill, who thought reform was necessary, if only out of an instinct for unionist self-preservation.

“It is frightfully hard to explain to Protestants that if you give Roman Catholics a good job and a good house they will live like Protestants, because they will see neighbours with cars and television sets; they will refuse to have 18 children,” he said.

“But if a Roman Catholic is jobless, and lives in the most ghastly hovel, he will rear 18 children on national assistance. If you treat Roman Catholics with due consideration and kindness, they will live like Protestants in spite of the authoritative nature of their Church.”

O’Neill visited Catholic schools and shook hands with nuns. Ian Paisley, whose film Journey to Rome: In Rome with the Pope’s Gestapo was being shown in towns across the North, condemned this fraternising.

“I see here ... The Lord’s warning against the Whore of Babylon, the Church of Rome ... We call upon Thee, O Lord, to get rid of the arch-traitor, the Prime Minister, Captain Terence O’Neill,” Paisley railed.

In 1965, despite opposition from fellow unionists, O’Neill invited Lemass to Stormont and visited Leinster House.

In 1966, members of the Ulster Volunteer Force, a Protestant paramilitary organisation dedicated to maintaining the union at all costs, shot dead two Catholics and petrol-bombed a Catholic-owned off license, burning to death a Protestant widow who lived in the adjoining house.

In August 1966, a group of Catholics and Protestants interested in reforming the North and ending discrimination in jobs, housing, and voting, met to discuss forming the Civil Rights Organisation, launched five months later.

The Unionist Party split into ‘pro-O’Neill’ and ‘anti-O’Neill’ factions. An O’Neill-supporting MP, George Forrest, was pulled off a platform after a Twelfth of July parade and kicked unconscious by fellow members of the Orange Order.

The first civil rights marches in Coalisland and Derry in 1968, and unionist resistance to their demands, are generally taken to mark the beginning of the Troubles. The scene was set for a conflict that lasted 30 years until the signing of the Belfast Agreement on Good Friday, April 10, 1998.

Planter and Gael

Roisin McCauley is a contributor to the ‘Bite-Sized Brexit’ series with her ‘Brexit and Northern Ireland: Bordering On Confusion?’. Picture: BBC NI
Roisin McCauley is a contributor to the ‘Bite-Sized Brexit’ series with her ‘Brexit and Northern Ireland: Bordering On Confusion?’. Picture: BBC NI

The first radio programme I made, 50 years ago, in 1969, was A Question of Identity, exploring the two traditions in the North through the poetry and meditations of Protestant and Catholic writers — including Seamus Heaney, John Hewitt, Louis MacNeice, and John Montague.

The latter, in a poem to his father, who had fought for Irish independence and afterwards chose exile in New York, expressed the nationalist sense of despair and abandonment after partition:

“But what if you have no country to set before Christ, only a broken province?

No parades, fierce medals, will mark Tyrone’s rebirth, betrayed by both South and North;

so lie still, difficult old man,

you were right to choose a Brooklyn slum rather than a half-life in this by-passed and dying place.”

John Hewitt, proud to be “an Ulsterman of planter stock” and “British”, wrote:

“...we have rights drawn from the soil and sky;

the use, the pace, the patient years of labour,

the rain against the lips, the changing light,

the heavy clay-sucked stride, have altered us;

we would be strangers in the Capitol;

this is our country also, nowhere else;

and we shall not be outcast on the world.”

British as Finchley?

I left the North in 1984, but revisited the subject of identity for a BBC television documentary, British as Finchley, using the shared world of greyhound racing, loved and enjoyed by both Catholics and Protestants, as a paradigm for the North itself. (The sport is nominally controlled by the UK, but all racing dogs are registered in Ireland.)

Reforms had ended the last vestiges of discrimination against Catholics. The Anglo-Irish Agreement of 1985 had given the Irish government an advisory role in the North. But how people defined themselves had not changed. Catholic greyhound owners and punters said they were Irish. Protestants were resolutely British.

The border was not only guarded by armed soldiers, but we had to show a manifest of our cameras and recording equipment to customs officers when crossing and recrossing it while making the programme.

All changed

When I came back to live in Belfast in 2014, I found Catholics comfortable here as never before. I attributed this not only to the peace accords and powersharing in a devolved parliament, but also to the European Union, whose benign umbrella now sheltered both identities.

The EU, especially encouraged by Jacques Delors, had poured money into the North and was the general political framework for relations between Northern Ireland, Britain, and Ireland.

The single market had made the border invisible. The peace achieved by the Good Friday Agreement meant it was no longer guarded by soldiers.

There was no widespread demand for a poll on Irish unity, as provided for in the Good Friday Agreement. Studies published that year showed the beginnings of a shared, Northern Irish identity. A pivotal moment had been the visit of Queen Elizabeth II to Dublin, when she not only spoke greetings in Irish, but laid a wreath at a memorial to Republicans who died in the struggle for Irish independence. I felt so optimistic.

‘It’s over, at last,” I said to myself.

“So hope for a great sea-change

On the far side of revenge.

Believe that further shore

Is reachable from here.”

I am a pessimist now. Brexit removes the benign umbrella of the EU, and has awakened old antagonisms. Dissident republicans are active. UVF flags fly in Belfast.

Identity is binary again. The borders in the mind cannot be dissolved by technology.

British prime minister Boris Johnson must surely be aware of the words of Winston Churchill in 1922 — so often quoted to be almost a cliché.

“The whole map of Europe has been changed ... but as the deluge subsides and the waters fall short we see the dreary steeples of Fermanagh and Tyrone emerging once again. The integrity of their quarrel is one of the few institutions that have been unaltered in the cataclysm which has swept the world.”

And I think of other, much quoted lines, written by Maurice Craig, poet and conservationist, from a Belfast Protestant background:

“The bricks they may bleed and the rain it may weep

And the damp Lagan fog lulls the city to sleep.

It’s to Hell with the future, and live on the past.

May the Lord in his mercy be kind to Belfast.”

- Roisin McAuley began her career as a newsreader for BBC Northern Ireland. She reported for the Irish Examiner, The Irish Times, and The Times, then for BBC radio and television documentary programmes Spotlight, Newsnight, File on 4, Brass Tacks, and Panorama. 

She has been a reporter/producer for ITV and Channel 4, and a presenter of radio features and series for BBC Radio 4 and Radio 3. Recently she presented Sunday Sequence on BBC Radio Ulster. 

She is the author of five published novels. She is a contributor to the Bite Sized Brexit series ‘Brexit And Northern Ireland Bordering On Confusion?’ edited by John Mair and Steve Mccabe with Neil Fowler and Leslie Budd. 

www.roisinmcauley.com

More on this topic

Fianna Fáil criticse Sinn Féin for refusing to take Westminster seats for Brexit votesFianna Fáil criticse Sinn Féin for refusing to take Westminster seats for Brexit votes

Labour: Varadkar will run from domestic agenda if Brexit deal agreed and election calledLabour: Varadkar will run from domestic agenda if Brexit deal agreed and election called

Number 10 declines to acknowledge midnight deadline over Brexit deal legal textNumber 10 declines to acknowledge midnight deadline over Brexit deal legal text

Next 24 hours will make or break Brexit deal, warns CoveneyNext 24 hours will make or break Brexit deal, warns Coveney