Judge rules it is not in boy's best interests to 'artificially prolong' life

Hospital bosses say staff have acted in the best interests of a ''profoundly neurologically disabled'' two-year-old boy at the centre of a High Court treatment dispute in the UK.

Judge rules it is not in boy's best interests to 'artificially prolong' life

Hospital bosses say staff have acted in the best interests of a ''profoundly neurologically disabled'' two-year-old boy at the centre of a High Court treatment dispute in the UK.

A judge has ruled that the youngster's life should not be artificially prolonged - and has given medics permission to provide only palliative care.

You have reached your article limit. Already a subscriber? Sign in

Unlimited access starts here.

Try from only €0.25 a day.

Cancel anytime

More in this section

Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited