Prosecutor accuses Mubarak of tyranny and corruption

THE chief prosecutor delivered the harshest assessment of Hosni Mubarak’s rule ever heard in an Egyptian courtroom, accusing the ousted leader of tyranny and corruption and saying he devoted the last 10 years of his three decades in power to ensuring his son would succeed him.

The speech by Mustafa Suleiman seemed aimed at energising the landmark trial of Mubarak, his two sons and eight other defendants after five months of sessions that were often bogged down by lengthy delays, muddled testimonies and complicated procedural issues.

The procedures have frustrated many Egyptians, who have hoped for swift and clear justice against Mubarak after his February 11 ousting following 18 days of unprecedented protests against his rule.

Many have worried that the generals who took power after Mubarak — and who owed their positions to him — have no interest in convicting him.

Suleiman’s unusually broad denunciations may also have been aimed at allaying such fears.

“He deserves to end in humiliation and indignity: From the presidential palace to the defendants’ cage and then the harshest penalty,” said Suleiman, whose comments mesmerised the courtroom.

Mubarak, his former chief of security and other top police figures are charged with complicity in the killing of more than 800 protesters in the crackdown on the popular uprising against his rule. He and his sons, Alaa and one-time heir apparent Gamal, face corruption charges in the same trial.

Mubarak could face the death penalty if convicted of complicity in the killing of protesters.

Yesterday’s session was the first of three days in which the prosecution will state its case against Mubarak, and it was the first time the chief prosecutor has spoken at length during the trial. His statement went far beyond the specific charges to denounce Mubarak’s broader rule.

Suleiman said that the corruption of Mubarak’s regime peaked in November and December 2010, when authorities engineered what is widely seen as the most fraudulent parliamentary election seen in Egypt since the army seized power in a 1952 coup. Mubarak’s ruling party won all but a handful of seats in the vote in what Suleiman said was part of a strategy to ensure Gamal’s succession.

“Here we have a president who devoted the last decade of his rule to engineer something that no one in Egypt ever dared to do before — the succession of his son,” said the prosecutor, addressing the presiding Judge, Ahmed Rifaat.

As has been the case since the trial began, the 83-year-old Mubarak came to court on a hospital gurney. His sons wore white prison uniforms. The judge adjourned the hearing until tomorrow.

A banker-turned-politician, Gamal began his climb to power in 2000. By the time the 18-day uprising broke out on January 25, he was effectively in charge of the Cabinet and the ruling party, wielding more powers than the prime minister.

Suleiman singled out Mubarak’s wife, Suzanne, for being one of the main advocates of Gamal Mubarak to be president.

“His wife wanted to be the mother of the next president after she has been the president’s wife,” he said. “They did not realise that Egypt was not a fiefdom.”