Letters to the Editor: The 'no' side in care referendum should show why current text is better

One reader responds to Senator Tom Clonan's call for a no vote in the care referendum, while others write about a range of topics including conflict in the Middle East 

Gearóid Murphy writes: 'In my view, those advocating for a no vote need to do more than just say why the proposed amendment could be better.' Stock picture: PA

I refer to the article by Senator Tom Clonan as to why he is voting no in the ‘Care’ referendum — ‘Amendment excludes right of disabled to independence’ (Irish Examiner, February 19). 

I would like to make a small response.