It is near impossible to prove which O’Brien documents are the originals

Denis O’Brien may be a lot of things, but a fool isn’t one of them. 

It is near impossible to prove which O’Brien documents are the originals

He must surely have known the fallout that would occur over his attempt to silence Catherine Murphy. What is he trying to keep hidden that is worth all the negative exposure to which he is uncharacteristically subjecting himself?

O’Brien has stated that documents were stolen and altered, and that it is these documents to which Catherine Murphy was referring in the Dáil. He is stating this as if it were fact; nowhere does he mention the word ‘allegedly’. The media are reiterating his statement, also without the word ‘allegedly’, thereby lending some credibility to O’Brien’s statement. This is unfair to Murphy, but what else would you expect from a master of media.

You have reached your article limit. Already a subscriber? Sign in

Unlimited access starts here.

Try from only €0.25 a day.

Cancel anytime

More in this section

Revoiced

Newsletter

Had a busy week? Sign up for some of the best reads from the week gone by. Selected just for you.

Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited