Offensive to hear our senators cling to jobs
Arguing that the Seanad allows for different voices and more scrutiny of proposed legislation actually argues in favour of Dáil reform. If the Dáil electoral system was changed to a list system to remove the clientelist, parish-pump, coffin chasing gombeens and allow for a broader range of more talented people to enter public life, and Dáil procedures changed to allow for more time to scrutinise legislation and hold the executive to account, what need would there be for a Seanad?
Arguing that because other countries also have senates, Ireland should too, ignores that some are federal or highly devolved countries which use their senate to provide equality of representation for their constituent regions. Others are monarchies or former monarchies where the senate represents, or used to represent, the aristocracy or intellectual elite. As Ireland is not a federal country, and is supposed to be a republic, this is a moot argument.