Incinerator would not provide home energy

TED CROSBIE (Letters, July 14) welcomes an incinerator in Ringaskiddy. He tells us of the virtues of an almost magical sounding proposal where we would all be provided with recycled energy.

However, his dreamlike scenario is not what is proposed at Ringaskiddy. He refers to some sort of underwater tunnel where the energy would be distributed to homes. That was never part of Indaver’s plans.

He also conveniently forgets about the second incinerator proposed at Ringaskiddy — a facility which would mean the importation of toxic waste from mainland Europe.