It is not the function of the GAA to promote other codes

IN reply to comments made in Diarmuid O’Flynn’s recent column on the use of Croke Park, I found a little confusing to say the least.

Diarmuid states he has no problem with Rugby coming to our national stadium, but has with Soccer — surely it’s the same difference.

Also his term ‘begrudgers’ directed at those of us who oppose the use of Croke Park is insulting. Opposition to use of Croke Park, is purely to protect the best interests of the Association’s future.

Already during the past number of months three GAA stadia in Munster have been requested to open its gates in the event of high profile Rugby competitions. This is not in the best interests of the Association. Sporting bodies must have their own identity and independence and not depend on the GAA.

Promoting other codes and raising their profile should not be the GAA’s function. While we must accept this situation for now, I believe the restoration of Rule 42 should be a priority. This controversial issue is far from over. We must continue to highlight that sport isn’t all about money and outside influences.

With the introduction of the Championship’s back door system this should provide the revenue to sufficiently secure the financial affairs of the Association. For everyone’s sake lets hope the redevelopment of Lansdowne Road will soon become a reality. While naturally we wish our international teams every success, having their own facilities would be more appropriate and best for all organisations involved.

M Crowley

Scarriff

Midleton

Co Cork