'Mind-blowing' delay for new Cork hospital as crucial documents not delivered for eight months

Fine Gael TD for Cork North Central Colm Burke declared as 'mind-blowing' the fact a decision on Corkâs elective hospital will not now be made before November. Picture: Gareth Chaney/CollinsÂ
Crucial documents needed for the development of a new elective hospital in Cork were delayed by eight months, it has emerged.
The Department of Health came in for stinging criticism at the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) after the news was confirmed.
Fine Gael TD for Cork North Central Colm Burke declared as âmind-blowingâ the fact a decision on Corkâs elective hospital will not now be made before November at the earliest.
Appearing before the committee, David Moloney, the secretary-general of the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform, said a preliminary business case for the new hospital for his departmentâs consideration regarding its sign-off was only received in late September.
Those documents were first delivered to the Department of Health by the HSE in January of this year. It is unclear why it took so long for the documents to be transferred on to DPER.
The Department of Health said that over the second half of this year "the project level business cases for elective care centres in Cork and Galway have been subject to internal review by the Department of Health, including by the Departmental Irish Government Economic and Evaluation Serviceâ.
It added that in September an External Assurance Process (EAP) review was completed.
âCompletion of the EAP enabled the business cases to be submitted to the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform and the major projects advisory group."
Last month, on September 28, one day after the Department of Health delivered the documents to DPER, its secretary-general Robert Watt told the Oireachtas health committee he expected a decision to be handed down in mid-October.

However, such a decision would have been an impossibility, Mr Moloney told the PAC, as there is a six to eight-week timeframe for all such business cases to be considered by the major projects advisory group within DPER.
âI was told weâd have a decision in October. Previously the Department of Health had said it would be late June or early July,â Mr Burke told the
.âToday was the first I heard about the delay in getting the documents across. I donât understand why I was told a decision was about to be made when it couldnât have been.Â
The Cork TD added âit goes to show that you have to keep after Government departments if you want to get anything doneâ.
Building public elective hospitals in Cork, Galway, and Dublin has been under discussion within Government as part of plans to tackle long delays for patients, notably at Cork University Hospital.
Separately, the committee heard that DPER is currently considering legal advice from the attorney general regarding the legal soundness of publishing details of the salaries of secretaries-general.
This issue had arisen in January of this year after it emerged that Mr Watt in his new role as head of the Department of Health had been claiming an âŹ81,000 pay rise to his salary despite previously claiming he would waive the rise until such time as âthe economy begins to recoverâ.
DPER told the committee that publishing the actual remuneration of a secretary-general âmight stray into issues of personal information, as well as matters related to tax legislationâ.
Advice from the attorney general regarding the matter was finally received on September 27, DPER said, some eight months after the matter was first raised at PAC.
âThe department is considering this advice at present,â it said.
Publishing the remuneration of a secretary-general has not hitherto been the norm within departmental accounts, despite the pay packages of CEOs of State bodies being routinely published on an annual basis.
Mr Wattâs controversial move from the DPER to the Department of Health in April 2021 saw him attain a salary âŹ81,000 in excess of other secretaries-general.Â
The manner of the appointment was subsequently subject to a highly critical report into the matter by the joint committee on finance, which declared Mr Watt had behaved with âan utter disregardâ for transparency.