Alan Harte loses challenge to conviction and sentence for Kevin Lunney kidnapping
Alan Harte claimed he was entitled to the same trial in a non-jury court as an accused would receive in a jury court. File picture: Collins Courts
Alan Harte has lost his High Court bid to set aside his conviction and 30-year prison sentence for his role in the kidnapping and attack of businessman Kevin Lunney.
Harte (42) was tried and sentenced at the three-judge Special Criminal Court in December 2021 for committing serious harm to and falsely imprisoning the Quinn Industrial Holdings (QIH) director in 2019.
He challenged the constitutionality of a section of the 1939 Offences Against the State Act that permits a two-thirds majority verdict at the non-jury court and that an accused is not informed whether the court’s verdict is a unanimous or majority decision.
He claimed he was entitled to the same trial in a non-jury court as an accused would receive in a jury court. Without this, his treatment before the court was unfair and unlawful, he alleged.
In her ruling on Monday, Ms Justice Marguerite Bolger said a person tried before the Special Criminal Court does not enjoy a right to a “mirror image” of the trial process before a jury court.
Harte was not in a similar or comparable position to a person tried before the jury courts because he was subjected to a process provided for by article 38.3 of the Constitution, she said. This does not breach his constitutional rights to equality or to a trial in accordance with law, she found.
He does not enjoy a right to a similar five-sixths majority verdict or to know about any dissenting decision, she said. Ms Justice Bolger dismissed his judicial review challenge.
A Special Criminal Court judge said Harte, of Island Quay Apartments East Wall, Dublin, but now of Portlaoise Prison, had a “ringleader” role in the kidnapping of Mr Lunney at a yard in Drumbrade, Ballinagh, Co. Cavan. He was tried alongside three other accused persons at the Special Criminal Court.




