Waiter awarded €3.2k for being unfairly dismissed after eating croissant behind cafe counter

A café has been ordered to pay €3,200 compensation to a waiter for unfairly dismissing him over eating a croissant while at work.

Waiter awarded €3.2k for being unfairly dismissed after eating croissant behind cafe counter

A café has been ordered to pay €3,200 compensation to a waiter for unfairly dismissing him over eating a croissant while at work.

The café is counting the cost of the unfair dismissal after the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) found that the manner of the dismissal was entirely contrary to the principle of fairness and natural justice.

The Kosovo-born waiter was sacked after his boss saw him eating the croissant behind the counter in full view of cafe customers on January 8, 2019.

The two sides gave conflicting versions of the sequence of events around the croissant incident.

The waiter stated that after he tried to explain that he needed to eat something before taking medication, the Head Manager told him: "you know what, you are finished, you can just go home".

The waiter - who required the medication for back pain - said that when moments earlier the Head Manager had spotted him eating the croissant behind the counter, the head manager came down and asked: "What the f**k are you doing behind the counter?"

The waiter said that the Head Manager stepped inside the counter, pushed the plate towards his hand and said: "Get the f**k to the back".

Employed by the café since September 2017, the waiter said that he had paid for the croissant and that he was really embarrassed in how he was addressed by the Head Manager and dismissed in front of his work colleagues and customers who all know him.

He said that he had permission from the café’s floor manager to eat the croissant.

WRC Adjudication Officer, James Kelly said that the decision was made by the cafe to end the waiter’s source of income and livelihood “without being in full sight of all the facts”.

Mr Kelly said the obvious missing piece in the investigation by the employer was the waiter’s side of the story which is entirely contrary to the principle of fairness and natural justice.

He said that, on balance, he found that the manner in which the cafe failed to conduct any investigation in line with its own disciplinary procedure fails to comply with fair procedures and natural justice.

Mr Kelly said: “In the circumstances, I find that the Complainant was unfairly dismissed.”

According to the café, the waiter did not get permission from the Floor Manager to eat the croissant and eating the croissant in full view of customers was a breach of the staff food policy.

The café stated that the Head Manager never verbally abused the waiter in front of the customers or staff.

The café told the WRC that due to continued issues with the waiter’s performance over the previous few months leading up to the events in January 2019, it deemed that his performance was not acceptable, and the only course of action was for the waiter to be dismissed.

The café said that the waiter was on a warning and that it was of the opinion that it went out of its way to help the waiter during the course of his employment and it even provided references for him to get accommodation.

It said that it provided him with additional help and training but there were countless problems reoccurring.

More in this section

Puzzles logo
IE-logo

Puzzles hub

Visit our brain gym where you will find simple and cryptic crosswords, sudoku puzzles and much more. Updated at midnight every day.

Puzzles logo
IE-logo

Puzzles hub

Visit our brain gym where you will find simple and cryptic crosswords, sudoku puzzles and much more. Updated at midnight every day.