Disputes over how best to pay compensation could have 'unwelcome consequences'

Ongoing disputes with the judiciary regarding how best to compensate plaintiffs is likely to “have unwelcome consequences”, according to the head of the State's Claims Agency.

Disputes over how best to pay compensation could have 'unwelcome consequences'

Ongoing disputes with the judiciary regarding how best to compensate plaintiffs is likely to “have unwelcome consequences”, according to the head of the State's Claims Agency.

Ciaran Breen, the director of the State Claims Agency, said it is strongly of the view that Periodic Payment Orders (PPOs) “represent the best system of compensating people who have suffered catastrophic injuries, because PPOs ensure that families will not have the worry that a lump-sum payment may run out during their loved ones’ lifetime”.

Already a subscriber? Sign in

You have reached your article limit.

Unlimited access. Half the price.

Annual €130 €65

Best value

Monthly €12€6 / month

More in this section

Lunchtime News

Newsletter

Keep up with stories of the day with our lunchtime news wrap and important breaking news alerts.

Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited