BBC News' Ros Atkins: My 7-step guide to mastering the art of explanation
Ros Atkins: the BBC News' analysis editor explains the art of explanation. Pic: Jeff Overs.
I recently went to a talk given by a psychologist on objective reality.
What promised to be an interesting and thought-provoking event was marred by its presentation; the psychologist spoke too quickly and quietly, gave too much information too rapidly, and went off on too many tangents.
He used too much jargon. I fell asleep with my eyes open and left at the break.
- Simplicity (“Is this the simplest way I can say this?”)
- Essential detail (“What detail is essential to this explanation?”)
- Complexity (“Are there elements of this subject I don’t understand?”)
- Efficiency (“Is this the most succinct way I can say this?”)
- Precision (“Am I saying exactly what I want to communicate?”)
- Context (“Why does this matter to the people I’m addressing?”)
- No distractions (“Are there verbal, written or visual distractions?”)
- Engaging (“Are there moments when attention could waver?”)
- Useful (“Have I answered the questions that people have?”)
- Clarity of purpose (“What am I trying to explain?”)

This could be, he says, “an essay, a report, presentation, a speech, a lecture, a work briefing” rather than a dynamic situation involving two-way conversation.
So you think about who the information is for, about the specific questions the explanation needs to answer, the duration of your explanation etc. — before you ever start information gathering.
This can involve a summary of what you’re explaining, and for whom; a list of questions your audience might ask; a list of what you’re not clear about; a list of areas you need to cover; and lots of information about the subject.
Basically, a lot of lists.
Are there gaps in your information? What about sources – are they direct and reliable?
Beware of information from unreliable/biased sources. And is all the information you have in its simplest form?
Make a list of the main strands – introduction, main ideas, conclusion — and think about what story you want to tell. Try different starting points, consider different story structures, add high-impact elements and visual elements.
Does it work when you put it all together?
When you start writing, use clear language and avoid hard stops — abrupt gaps that give people a chance to tune out.
Instead use trailing techniques — “If you’re wondering how…..”, “I promise to show you….”, “And then afterwards we will……” which keeps people engaged.
Read aloud and ask yourself things like — are there any obstacles to understanding, any unnecessary complications, could anything be made shorter and snappier without losing content and meaning?
Is there anything unexplained that could be distracting? Does the start hook you in, and does the finish give a clear conclusion?
And finally — are all the strands and elements essential? Get a second opinion.
Present your explanation to another person to test its punch and clarity — a second opinion can also be a confidence boost as well as constructive criticism.
You have your material collated and prepared. Now practice delivering it.
Delivery involves verbalisation (“Does it sound like me? Does each sentence logically move on to the next?”), having your visual elements lined up, whether to use a script or using your memory (or a bit of both); the pace of your presentation; sticking to time limits; feeling comfortable in your clothes; and the importance of rehearsal.
You need to practice, practice, practice. And then deliver. “All our lives our shaped in part by the information we share, the information we seek and the information we receive,” Atkins concludes.
He recalls how one of his BBC colleagues compared the art of clear explanation to cleaning a window — “You can see through a dirty window but if you clean the window you can see so much better.”
Once you start doing it, Atkins says, there’s no going back.
- The Art of Explanation is published by Hachette

