Airtricity, Next and Pure Telecom convicted of sending spam

Three companies have been left with court convictions for making unsolicited marketing phone calls and sending spam emails.

Airtricity, Next and Pure Telecom convicted of sending spam

Three companies have been left with court convictions for making unsolicited marketing phone calls and sending spam emails.

Renewable energy company Airtricity Ltd, clothing chain Next and Pure Telecom are the latest firms to be successfully prosecuted at Dublin District Court by the office of the Data Protection Commissioner.

The case was taken after the watchdog received complaints from members of the public about being contacted for marketing purposes.

Judge William Hamill noted today that the companies had pleaded guilty at an early stage to charges under the Data Protection Act, and they had contributed to the costs of bringing the case.

However, he refused to spare them recorded convictions; Pure Telecom was fined €500, Airtricity has to pay a €75 fine and Next was fined €100.

Assistant Data Protection Commissioner Tony Delaney told Judge Hamill that one woman had used Next's unsubscribe facility to stop getting spam from the clothing chain.

However that did not work and on February 25 and February 28 last year she received more marketing emails from the company. “One of them was a gift idea for mother's day,” Mr Delaney said adding that they were, “typical marketing emails but clearly when she had opted out she should not have been getting them”.

Judge Hamill noted that the company had no prior convictions and that Next had used a third party company to handle the unsubscribe process but has since stopped dealing with them.

In relation to Pure Telcom Mr Delaney said that his office received a complaint from a man with an ex-directory phone number who had received two promotional cold calls last March.

Judge Hamill was told that Pure Telecom had been fined €1,250 in 2010 for a breach of data protection regulations. The company's director Paul Connell said that the promotional calls came from a third party agent which has since been dismissed, and he apologised to the complainant.

The court also heard that a man with an ex-directory phone number had received a call on May 10 last offering a promotion on behalf of Airtricity which had then been using a third party sales company to handle a promotion.

Judge Hamill heard that this company had been using an old computer with an out-of-date call list from 2009.

The court heard that Airtricity had no prior convictions but had been given a formal warning in 2010 in relation to other complaints.

More in this section

Budget 2022 Logo

What impact will this  year's budget have on you and your business.

IE logo
Devices


UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE IRISH EXAMINER FOR TEAMS AND ORGANISATIONS
FIND OUT MORE

The Business Hub
Newsletter

News and analysis on business, money and jobs from Munster and beyond by our expert team of business writers.

Sign up
Puzzles logo
IE-logo

Puzzles hub

Visit our brain gym where you will find simple and cryptic crosswords, sudoku puzzles and much more. Updated at midnight every day. PS ... We would love to hear your feedback on the section right HERE.

Lunchtime
News Wrap

A lunchtime summary of content highlights on the Irish Examiner website. Delivered at 1pm each day.

Sign up
Revoiced
Newsletter

Some of the best bits from irishexaminer.com direct to your inbox every Monday.

Sign up