McKillen ‘totally vindicated’ after magazine apologises for Claridge’s Hotel ‘front man’ slur
The article incorrectly stated Mr McKillen was a “front man” for Qatari investors in the luxury hotel, the court heard.
Jim O’Callaghan, counsel for Mr McKillen, said the matter arose out of a defamation action over the article but he was pleased to tell the court the matter had been settled and solicitor for the magazine, Simon McAleese, would read out an apology.
The apology stated that on March 29 last, in the print and online editions, the Spectator (1828) Ltd, publishers of the magazine, ran an article in the ‘Taki’ column entitled: ‘It might be time to avoid Claridges’.
The article referred to an “Irish front man” for the Qataris which could have been taken as a reference to Mr McKillen.
“The defendant’s column had incorrectly assumed Mr McKillen’s investment in Claridges was being financed by Qatari funding.
“It accepts this was incorrect and that it was therefore wrong to describe Mr McKillen as a front man for the Qataris”.
The magazine withdrew any corresponding criticism of Mr McKillen and “apologises to him for its error”, it added.
Mr Justice Nicholas Kearns agreed to strike out the matter with no further order.
Mr McKillen was not in court but a statement issued on his behalf afterwards he said the Spectator “published totally incorrect facts about me, which I believe was a blatant attempt to undermine my reputation.”
Mr McKillen’s solicitor, Paul Tweed, said his client had been “totally vindicated by this comprehensive and categoric retraction and apology”.
Mr Tweed added his client “will not hesitate to take appropriate legal action to protect his business from any future attempts to undermine his reputation”.





