Gwyneth Paltrow cleared of all fault in high-profile US skiing collision lawsuit

Gwyneth Paltrow has been cleared of all fault in a US lawsuit over a 2016 skiing collision, brought by retired optometrist Terry Sanderson.
Following a high-profile two-week trial in Utah, jurors returned a verdict in favour of the Oscar-winning actress after just over two hours.
Mr Sanderson had sued Ms Paltrow over the collision at the Deer Valley ski resort in Utah over seven years ago, which left him with several broken ribs and severe head injuries.
She had denied the claim, and accused Mr Sanderson of crashing into her, resulting in her losing âhalf a day of skiingâ with her family and being âsoreâ.
On Thursday jurors apportioned â100%â of the blame to Mr Sanderson for the crash, and found him to be responsible for the injuries Ms Paltrow had suffered.
They awarded the actress her âsymbolicâ counterclaim of one dollar in damages.
Ms Paltrow and Mr Sanderson, who both gave evidence during the trial, were present in court for the verdict.
The actress wore a blue blazer, with a white shirt and brown trousers, and did not appear to react as the verdict was returned, but let out a long breath.
As she exited the courtroom she touched Mr Sanderson on the shoulder and whispered something to him.

She previously said she felt âvery sorryâ for his health decline following the incident, but maintained she had not been âat faultâ and said she had been the âvictimâ.
Mr Sandersonâs lawyers previously suggested the jury award him damages of more than three million dollars in the case.
During closing arguments earlier on Thursday the court heard that Ms Paltrow faced a âransomâ for a âmeritless claimâ, and that she had shown âcourageâ by attending court for the two-week trial.
Stephen Owens, representing Ms Paltrow, said the actress had sat in court for two weeks as a âpunching bagâ and had been âuncomfortableâ during proceedings.
âIt takes a lot of courage does it not?â he told the jury in his own closing argument.

â(Mr Sandersonâs) life has been laid open â thatâs because of him. He hit her. He hurt her and he wants three million dollars for it.
âThatâs not fair. The easy thing for my client would have been to write a cheque and be done with it â but what does that tell her kids?
âItâs wrong, itâs actually wrong that he hurt her and he wants money from her.â
He added: âThis is a meritless claim.
âYou donât throw a three-million-dollar bombshell in the courtroom, call her (Gwyneth Paltrow) King Kong, and walk away. You shouldnât reward that.
âGwyneth, who could have just paid it out, paid the ransom, (said) âno Iâm not doing that. Iâm not going to have someone hurt me and then ask me for a lot of money. Iâm not going to do itâ.â
In their closing arguments, Mr Sandersonâs lawyers had said Ms Paltrow was ânot a liarâ but had been mistaken about what had happened.
Robert Sykes told jurors that the actressâs views on the collision were âsincerely expressedâ but incorrect.
âGwyneth is a good person. She is a good mother and she loves her children and she is passionate about things,â he said.
âI think that she believes, and I believe Gwyneth Paltrow when she says âTerry hit me in the backâ â itâs a sincere belief but the problem is a sincere belief doesnât make it so.â
On Wednesday Mr Sanderson told the court it was âvery difficultâ to sue a celebrity and said he felt the point of the trial had been to make him âregretâ bringing action against the Hollywood actress.
Throughout the trial jurors have also heard from a variety of medical experts, ski instructors, and members of both Mr Sandersonâs and Ms Paltrowâs families, including the actressâs children, Apple and Moses Martin.