Custody-battle dad prioritised pet fish over parenting skills assessment in UK
Judge Eleanor Owens said the man felt “very strongly” about the fish and had “got quite emotional” when they were mentioned.
She said he had asked a social worker “whether he could bring the fish with him”.
The judge said he seemed to have a “slightly odd order of his priorities”.
She concluded that the children, a boy approaching three and a girl of 18 months, should be brought up by relatives.
Both youngsters had been placed into temporary foster care, after the little girl was hurt and concerns were raised about the care they were receiving from their parents, said the judge.
The couple had now separated.
Judge Owens said the mother, who had behavioural difficulties, had ruled herself out as a carer.
But the man wanted the youngsters to be returned to his care.
The judge — who analysed the case at hearings in Oxford and Reading, Berkshire — said social workers had offered the man the option of a ‘parent and child’ placement or a ‘residential’ assessment, so that his parenting abilities could be gauged.
“(He) told me that he did not refuse to do this,” she said in a written ruling.
“However, it does seem clear that he raised a concern with the social worker about whether he could bring his fish with him.
"Clearly, he feels very strongly about the fish, as he told me they were (his son’s) fish and he got quite emotional when they were mentioned”.
She said the fact the man “did not apparently have anyone else available to look after the fish” also raised concerns about the effectiveness of his “support network”.
None of the people involved was identified.
