YouTube star suing over revenge porn
Chrissy Chambers, 24, who has a combined following of 435,000 subscribers and 85m views for the BriaAndChrissy channel with her partner Bria Kam, is seeking damages against her British ex-boyfriend after accusing him of posting explicit footage of her after they split up.
Chambers, who lives in Los Angeles, said footage from six years ago was made into videos and shared on a slew of pornographic websites, clearly identifying her as the participant.
The YouTuber has also started criminal proceedings in the UK. Any action would be considered a landmark case in the history of revenge porn, because the suspect and the complainant are in different jurisdictions.
Chambers said she had no idea she was the victim of revenge porn until comments began appearing on her YouTube channel.
She told The Guardian: âWhen I first saw the videos I felt Iâd been stripped of my dignity. It was like Iâd been hit in the chest and couldnât catch my breath,â she said.
âThe worst part was that I wasnât looking at someone else I could feel sorry for. I was looking at me. I felt frightened and powerless.â
She said she was also concerned about the impact the content â illegal in the UK since April under new revenge porn laws â would have on her young fans.
She said: âSome fans wrote to say they no longer respected us because of my involvement in the videos.
âOthers wrote to express their concern. Because of the police investigation, I didnât want to say anything.
âTwo years later the investigation is still ongoing and Iâve decided to finally speak out. Two years is a long time not to be able to speak up for yourself.â
Because the videos were posted before revenge porn became a criminal offence in the UK two months ago, Chambers is hoping for a prosecution under existing legislation for malicious communications and harassment.
Her lawyers are also bringing a civil claim in the UK against the perpetrator for invasion of privacy, breach of a duty of confidence, and harassment.
Ann Olivarius, senior partner at London-based law firm McAllister Olivarius, which is representing victims of revenge porn, said the new law is a good start, but doesnât go far enough.
She said: âThe law doesnât provide any way to get the material down quickly, and targets only those who âintend to cause distressâ to the person depicted in the image, which means that people who spread them afterwards for money or for kicks are exempt.




