Harry Potter’s creator brought proceedings in London’s High Court against Chris Gossage, a partner at Russells and a friend of his, Judith Callegari.
Her solicitor, Jenny Afia, told Mr Justice Tugendhat that Rowling was revealed in The Sunday Times as the writer of crime novel The Cuckoo’s Calling, which was published under the name of Robert Galbraith.
A few days later, Russells contacted her agent disclosing that it was Mr Gossage who had divulged the confidential information to Ms Callegari, who then communicated it in the course of a Twitter exchange with a journalist.
Ms Afia said Rowling, who was not in court, “has been left dismayed and distressed by such a fundamental betrayal of trust”. Mr Gossage, Ms Callegari and Russells all apologised, with the firm agreeing to reimburse Rowling’s legal costs and make a payment, by way of damages, to the Soldiers’ Charity.
Afterwards, a statement issued on the author’s behalf said that all global net royalties which would otherwise have been paid to her from book sales of The Cuckoo’s Calling would be donated to the charity for a period of three years, dating from Jul 14 — the day Galbraith’s identity was made known.
She said: “This donation is being made to The Soldiers’ Charity partly as a thank you to the army people who helped me with research, but also because writing a hero who is a veteran has given me an even greater appreciation and understanding of exactly how much this charity does for ex-servicemen and their families, and how much that support is needed.
“I always intended to give The Soldiers’ Charity a donation out of Robert’s royalties but I had not anticipated him making the bestseller list a mere three months after publication — indeed, I had not counted on him ever being there.”
Major General Martin Rutledge, CEO of the charity, said: “We are absolutely thrilled by the extraordinary generosity of JK Rowling who is such an internationally renowned author.
“This donation will make a huge difference to the lives of thousands of soldiers, former soldiers, and their families who are in real need.”
Ms Afia told the court that the author used the pseudonym to release the book in April free from the unprecedented publicity and expectation that accompanied her work.
Only a handful of trusted advisers, family, and friends were aware of Galbraith’s true identity until the front-page story made headlines worldwide.
“The claimant was angry and distressed that her confidences had been betrayed and this was very much aggravated by repeated speculation that the leak had, in fact, been a carefully co-ordinated publicity stunt by her, her agent and her publishers designed to increase sales.
“The claimant has been left dismayed and distressed by such a fundamental betrayal of trust.”