Diana, 10th Anniversary: Strong and confident yet a vulnerable human being

In the first of a three-day series, Jill Lawless looks at the controversy Diana still sparks today. Some see her as manipulative while others recall a warm, kind woman.

Diana, 10th Anniversary: Strong and confident yet a vulnerable human being

THE mounds of flowers are long gone from the gates of Kensington Palace, but Princess Diana’s presence lingers.

It has been 10 years since Diana’s death in a Paris car crash, when many Britons were poleaxed by grief for a vivacious and troubled woman who was at once style icon, charity worker and tabloid celebrity.

The anniversary will be marked by a televised memorial service, special prayers — and soul-searching in a country still unsure whether its sudden outpouring of emotion was a moment of madness or a fundamental softening of the stiff upper lip.

“A decade on,” columnist Jonathan Freedland wrote in The Guardian newspaper, “we look back and wonder what came over us.”

Diana, 36, and her boyfriend Dodi Fayed, 42, were killed along with chauffeur Henri Paul when their car crashed in a Paris tunnel on August 31, 1997.

In the days that followed, an estimated one million bouquets were left outside Diana’s Kensington Palace home and a similar number of people lined the route of her funeral procession. Newspapers exhorted the royal family to return from Scotland and make a display of mourning.

“People thought they knew her because she shared her thoughts and feelings, which no one in her position had ever done before,” said Ingrid Seward, author of The Queen and Di: The Untold Story.

In grieving for Diana, Ms Seward said, “people were mourning some aspect of themselves”.

When she died, Diana was the world’s most famous woman. She had married Prince Charles, the heir to the British throne, in a 1981 ceremony that was televised around the globe. They had two sons, William and Harry, but divorced in 1996 after admissions of adultery on both sides.

“She and the Prince of Wales could have been the best double-act the country has ever had,” said Ken Wharfe, Diana’s Scotland Yard bodyguard between 1986 and 1993. “But it didn’t work out.”

The rest of Diana’s life was divided between her sons and her charity work — for people with Aids, sick children and land mine victims. She made frequent appearances on newspaper front pages and gossip columns.

The official commemoration of Diana’s death will be subdued — a memorial service for friends and family at the Guards Chapel in London’s Wellington Barracks: Diana’s sons are officers in an army regiment, the Household Cavalry.

Days before the anniversary, a few bunches of roses are stuck through the gilded gates of Kensington Palace.

Official attempts to commemorate Diana have been troubled. A memorial fountain in Hyde Park was opened by Queen Elizabeth II in 2004, but it was shut to the public the next day after flooding and had to undergo months of renovation.

On the anniversary, Diana-philes will leave a wreath outside the palace, as they do every year.

“We intend to keep her memory alive, and we intend she is given her proper place in the annals of history,” said Margaret Funnell of the Diana Circle, a dedicated group of fans.

Diana’s legacy is hotly debated. Some see a narcissist who courted media attention. Others recall a warm, generous woman who focused her energy on charitable causes and dared to hug Aids victims at a time when that was still taboo, even feared.

“Diana was ahead of her time,” said Mr Wharfe. “When she took on the challenge of dealing with Aids, it was a real problem for the royal family. I remember the queen saying, ‘Why do you get involved in all these nasty things? Why don’t you do something nice?’”

In prayers written for the memorial service, Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams said Diana’s “vulnerability and her willingness to reach out to the excluded and forgotten touched us all”.

Ms Seward says Diana’s image has improved with time, her good works outshining her messy love life.

“It’s the opposite of [Shakespeare’s] Julius Caesar — ‘The evil that men do lives after them.’ The good she did lives after her, which is appropriate for an icon,” Ms Seward said.

French and British investigations have concluded the driver on the night she died, Mr Paul, was drunk and lost control of the car while trying to evade photographers. But Dodi’s father, Mohamed al Fayed, insists Diana and his son were murdered at the behest of the royal family. A British coroner’s inquest is unlikely to end the debate.

Diana’s most enduring legacy may be her impact on the monarchy, which was widely viewed as stiff and aloof just after her death but took steps to appear warmer.

Princes William and Harry, dressed in jeans and dancing as they hosted a rock concert in their mother’s honour last month, are symbols of the shift.

“I think they are back on a solid footing,” Ms Seward said of the royals.

More in this section

Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited