Michael D should sympathise with the protesters and be a people’s president

“Did he not have a constitutionally powerful tool at his disposal ? He also had the choice to resign rather than sign it.”

That is Helen Breathnach’s (Irish Examiner, Letters, January 30) perspective on President Michael D Higgins and the recent furore over ‘presidential protesting’.

Trawling through Higgins’s own protesting CV, she presses the president on his options vis-a-vis signing-off on the water-charges bill.

You have reached your article limit. Already a subscriber? Sign in

Unlimited access starts here.

Try from only €0.25 a day.

Cancel anytime

More in this section

Revoiced

Newsletter

Had a busy week? Sign up for some of the best reads from the week gone by. Selected just for you.

Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited