Why muted response to CIÉ attack?

It is interesting to note the muted response to Transport Minister Leo Varadkar’s “withdrawal” of the additional €36m subvention to CIÉ. Still less his stated reasons for doing so.

Why muted response to CIÉ attack?

While Mr Varadkar did inform the trade unions at their meeting (Sep 19, 2012) that he hoped to see a speedy conclusion to the cost-cutting plans, he did not make it a pre-condition for the then expected €36m. So, why did he change his mind? What has made the minister suddenly accept the original preferred option of his officials at the Department of Transport, Tourism & Sport, ie for CIÉ to obtain a loan from the National Reserve Pension Fund? An option which will place additional liabilities on the fragile financial position of CIÉ.

The minister also implied that CIÉ was dragging its feet in selling off some of its assets in order to fund the Irish Rail Voluntary Severance package (€20m). This is not true. There is a tendering process which cannot be fast tracked.

Already a subscriber? Sign in

You have reached your article limit.

Unlimited access. Half the price.

Annual €120 €60

Best value

Monthly €10€5 / month

CONNECT WITH US TODAY

Be the first to know the latest news and updates

More in this section

Revoiced

Newsletter

Sign up to the best reads of the week from irishexaminer.com selected just for you.

Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited