Individuals should not have to pay

It is bad enough when our economists repeatedly refuse to address the fact that the problems in our world are all caused by our so-called ’benign watchdog’ central banks, and that they are all privately owned institutions causing untold tyranny in our lives.

However, exception must be taken when instead they continually blame the people.

After reading Jim Power’s article (Examiner, Mar 30) I felt compelled to reply. The household charge is not enforceable under the law of the land as he states. The law of the land is the common law and it ensures the individual is protected from dominance. A crime is only ever committed when any party is injured, or if their property is stolen or damaged.

Outside of that no other law is enforceable on the individual. It keeps man in balance with nature and with his fellow man. Forcing people to pay a levy, any levy, is actually applying statute laws of the State. The State is not the land. The land is an eternal and divine construct that provides for the needs of the people in perpetuity, while the nation-state is a man-made construct, designed primarily to raise revenue from the people.

The question to be asked is why does it need to raise revenue from the people? Well it does so mainly to try and pay off debt that cannot be repaid, i.e. debt to the aforementioned private central banks. You see these banks sell us our money and ensure we cannot pay it back because they never issue any of the interest they levy on us. So legitimately we can reject statute law as our common law rights are being violated daily when we service unserviceable debt. We are paying more than we owe, i.e. theft. The flip side is that nobody can reject common law. Therefore when the State aggressively tries to raise revenue to pay these bankers they are actually making themselves complicit in violating the common law of the land.

When we close the central banks and our governments issue our money we will be free again and common law can return. When this day of reckoning comes for these banks you will amazingly find that the majority of our taxation will be eliminated as it is not needed anymore. Also, the State will not have such high wage bills as the people will also be free from unlawful excessive private debt. All economic theories will need to be re-written.

Mr Power’s final comment is most apt: ‘The people need to cop on to the realities’.

We will Jim, we will, at last. And you know what? It promises an abundant future for one and all.

Barry Fitzgerald

Lissarda

Cork