We need a frank debate about Europe’s future

IN 1801, those in political and economic power advocated and agreed the Act of Union, with Britain.

In 2006 and in 2007 the same vested interests brought about the Lisbon Treaty. Up to that point the vast majority were only aware of a common market.

Before the Act of Union, there were the plantations and before the Lisbon Treaty there were the open borders with all of the new Europe.

Both mass migrations were, in part, motivated by an attempt of assimilation into the greater entity. In a mature and open democracy, would our present government have the confidence in its people to have a frank and calm national debate, in order to achieve a national consensus — do we wish to be part of a United Nations of Europe or a federation?

The outcome would give a clear mandate and strength to our national leaders. At present very few citizens, are aware of the positives and negatives or even the long-term plans, regarding an integrated Europe. Whether by design or accidental, it is a very poor and frightening reflection on Irish politicians.

Conor O’Sullivan

Wilton

Cork