‘Redneck’ laws not needed to combat trespassers

CLAIMS that trespassers are being protected by ridiculous laws is untrue. There is the valid defence of “lawful excuse” for anyone defending a person or property by the use of “reasonable force”, which means reasonable under the circumstances.

For Fine Gael to suggest indemnifying any unprovoked assault, no matter how serious, irrespective of the circumstances, under the guise of self-defence, and treating trespass and housebreaking, which is a serious offence, as if they were the same thing is wicked.

The law of trespass is unnecessary and does not exist in many countries such as Scotland. Who is a trespasser – any unexpected visitor? And how do you know if you are trespassing? How do you know if land or a road is public or private? If a trespasser is causing any harm or nuisance, there are numerous laws under which they can be prosecuted. The law already entitles the use of “reasonable force” to evict a trespasser. Does FG propose the right summarily to inflict any serious injury, as long as it is “non-fatal”, on anyone camping, picnicking or taking a short-cut across their land?