Limerick private hospital company must put up €1.79m for legal costs in claim against VHI

The company was behind a proposed €75m hospital project
Limerick private hospital company must put up €1.79m for legal costs in claim against VHI

The High Court has ruled that Limerick Private Ltd must put up €1.79m in legal costs before it can pursue a claim against the country's largest health insurer, VHI.

A private hospital company must put up €1.79m in legal costs before it can pursue a claim against the country's largest health insurer, the High Court has ruled.

Limerick Private Ltd and its director Shay Sweeney have sued the Voluntary Health Insurance (VHI) Board claiming the insurer abused its dominant position by refusing to provide cover in breach of competition law. They also seek damages for interference with their constitutional right to earn a livelihood. VHI denies the claims.

Hospital project

The company was behind the Limerick Private Hospital project which was a proposal for a five-storey above ground, with three levels underground, hospital costing some €75m. It would have 95 beds and six operating theatres. Planning permission was granted in March 2007.

Private hospitals essentially rely on health insurance funding to operate with a smaller input from patients who pay directly.

It is claimed that as a result of the VHI refusing cover, Limerick Private was unable to obtain third-party funding.

In 2015, shortly after the proceedings were initiated, the VHI's lawyers wrote to the plaintiffs calling on them to provide security for costs should they lose the case.

They said this was based on its annual returns which showed Limerick Private Ltd had never traded, had no assets, and would not be able to meet an order for costs against it.

Delays

This year, following a number of delays and a case that went all the way to the Supreme Court in relation to whether Limerick Private could call a particular expert witness, the VHI applied to the court seeking security for costs.

Limerick Private claimed its impecuniosity had been caused by the actions of the VHI in refusing cover and, therefore, this was a special circumstance which should disallow the granting of security for costs. It also claimed the VHI had delayed bringing its security for costs application and this disentitled it to an order.

The court heard legal cost accountants for the VHI assessed the VHI's costs in defending at €1.79m, excluding Vat. 

Mr Justice Max Barrett ordered the plaintiffs to provide security for costs in the amount of €1.79m.

He said the Limerick Private plaintiffs had not contested that the VHI had made out the existence of a bona fide defence to the claims.

They also did not dispute their (plaintiffs') own impecuniosity although it was asserted that this has been caused by the defendant’s wrongdoing, he said.

He did not consider the plaintiffs had established any special circumstance which would tilt the balance of justice against the making of an order for security for costs.

More in this section

Lunchtime News

Newsletter

Keep up with stories of the day with our lunchtime news wrap and important breaking news alerts.

Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited