Engagement eases hospital changes in South
More meaningful engagement with stakeholders in Cork and Kerry meant while protests did take place, opposition to the reconfiguration of acute hospital services and emergency services was not as acute as in the Midwest or Northeast.
The study found the southern region, where reconfiguration was headed up by obstetrician/gynaecologist Professor John Higgins, engaged in a more inclusive engagement process âwith a broad range of stakeholders apparently involved in designing the final reconfiguration planâ.
While protests did take place in the South, âthere did not appear to be the same degree of animosityâ as in the Northeast and Midwest. Researchers found that in the Northeast and Midwest, engagement was âtypically characterised as little more than information- sharingâ and âopposition among the public and other external stakeholders was a notable featureâ.
In the Northeast, hospital campaigners and GPs generally rejected the case for change, questioning the evidence provided and motivations behind the plan.
In the Midwest, GPs expressed concern at the loss of access to services at several hospitals. âThere wasnât consultation, it was decided that âweâre doing this and thatâs itâ and the level of consultation, thatâs a very important thing. Consultation means âevacuate your bases in Crimea, weâre moving inâ, thatâs consultation from the HSE,â one GP said.
The authors concluded that the need to develop âeffective public engagement strategies is particularly pressing in the âpost-truthâ world, where authority and expertise are coming under increasing public scrutinyâ and that wheeling out expert opinion is not enough to convince the public.
The study, by Foley C et al, âUnderstanding Perspectives on Major System Change: A comparative case study of public engagement and the implementation of urgent and emergency care system reconfigurationâ, has been published in Elsevierâs online science journal.




