Witness defends his claim there was no reason for ops

A fitness to practise inquiry into a consultant obstetrician and gynaecologist who performed hysterectomies on four elderly women has heard an expert witness defend his claims there may have been no clinical reason for the operations on two of the women.

Witness defends his claim there was no reason for ops

Dr Peter Van Geene performed the hysterectomies between 2009 and 2011 at Aut Even hospital in Kilkenny. Most of the women developed serious complications following these procedures, and they required further surgery.

Under cross-examination from Dr Van Geene’s solicitor Eugene Gleeson, witness Dr Peter McKenna defended his claims that there may have been no clinical reason for performing the operations on two of the women at the heart of this case.

Already a subscriber? Sign in

You have reached your article limit.

Unlimited access. Half the price.

Annual €130 €65

Best value

Monthly €12€6 / month

More in this section

Lunchtime News

Newsletter

Keep up with stories of the day with our lunchtime news wrap and important breaking news alerts.

Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited