Witness defends his claim there was no reason for ops

A fitness to practise inquiry into a consultant obstetrician and gynaecologist who performed hysterectomies on four elderly women has heard an expert witness defend his claims there may have been no clinical reason for the operations on two of the women.

Witness defends his claim there was no reason for ops

Dr Peter Van Geene performed the hysterectomies between 2009 and 2011 at Aut Even hospital in Kilkenny. Most of the women developed serious complications following these procedures, and they required further surgery.

Under cross-examination from Dr Van Geene’s solicitor Eugene Gleeson, witness Dr Peter McKenna defended his claims that there may have been no clinical reason for performing the operations on two of the women at the heart of this case.

You have reached your article limit. Already a subscriber? Sign in

Unlimited access starts here.

Try from only €0.25 a day.

Cancel anytime

More in this section

Lunchtime News

Newsletter

Get a lunch briefing straight to your inbox at noon daily. Also be the first to know with our occasional Breaking News emails.

Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited