The expansion of London’s Heathrow Airport inched closer when a High Court judge rejected legal challenges from environmental campaigners opposed to the building of a third runway.
Judge Gary Hickinbottom said he did not accept the arguments made by environmentalists and did not believe the UK government’s transport minister acted unlawfully when he approved the expansion of Europe’s biggest airport.
“The court held that none of the climate change grounds was arguable,” a summary of the judgment said.
The campaigners can apply for permission to appeal the rulings.
Britain has spent almost half a century trying to decide whether or where to build a new runway in the densely populated south-east of England.
If finally opened, it will be the first full-length runway built in the London area for 70 years.
Prime Minister Theresa May’s government has argued that expansion will show Britain is open for business and able to develop stronger trading ties with Asia after it leaves the EU — although Brexit has been delayed by a parliamentary deadlock over the terms of departure.
But the expansion plan is still opposed by London Mayor Sadiq Khan, and a lengthy legal wrangle still lies ahead if the campaigners decide to launch another appeal in the next seven days.
Labour party finance spokesman John McDonnell described the court ruling as “bizarre” after he attended the hearing in London.
“This is just the first stage in defeating 3rd runway and protecting our environment,” Mr McDonnell said on Twitter.
The airport, which is jointly owned by Spain’s Ferrovial, the Qatar Investment Authority, China Investment Corporation and other investment companies, is in Mr McDonnell’s constituency.
The expansion plan, endorsed by parliament last year, is forecast to cost around £14bn (€16.2bn).
Under the current plan, the third runway is expected to become operational by 2026.