Adrian Hardiman offered up refreshing decisions and never afraid to 'go against the grain'

IN THE usually arid language of Supreme Court legal judgments, Adrian Hardiman’s contributions delivered a welcome drop of refreshment.
Not shy about injecting passion into his conclusions, he would declare a contrary claim as “astonishing”, a perceived breach of legal principle as “horrifying”, and an ill-argued point as “bewildering”, “nonsense”, or, on a good day, both.