Paris appeals court finds Airbus, Air France guilty of corporate manslaughter over 2009 crash

Workers unloading debris, belonging to crashed Air France flight AF447, from the Brazilian Navy's Constitution Frigate in the port of Recife, northeast of Brazil, Sunday, June 14, 2009. Picture: AP Photo/Eraldo Peres, File

A Paris appeals court on Thursday found Airbus and Air France guilty of corporate manslaughter over the 2009 Rio-Paris plane crash that killed 228 passengers and crew ​in France's worst air disaster.

The verdict is the latest milestone in a legal marathon involving two ​of France's most emblematic companies and relatives of the mainly French, Brazilian and ⁠German victims.

Three newly qualified Irish doctors, who graduated from Trinity College Dublin in 2007, were returning from a holiday in Brazil when they were killed in the crash. Dr Aisling Butler, age 26, was from Roscrea, Co Tipperary; Dr Jane Deasy, age 27, from Dublin, and Dr Eithne Walls, age 28, from Co Down.

Relatives of some of the 228 passengers and crew who died when the Airbus A330 ​vanished in darkness during an Atlantic storm gathered to hear the verdict after their 17-year legal ​battle to pinpoint blame for France's worst air disaster.

The court ordered the companies to pay the maximum fine for corporate manslaughter, €225,000 each, following the request of prosecutors during the eight-week trial.

In 2023, a lower court had cleared the two ​companies, both of which have repeatedly denied the charges.

The maximum fines, amounting to just a few minutes ​of either company's revenue, have been widely dismissed as a token penalty. But family groups have said a ‌conviction ⁠would represent a recognition of their plight.

FURTHER APPEALS SEEN LIKELY 

French lawyers have predicted further appeals to the country's highest court, potentially dragging the process out for years more and prolonging the ordeal for relatives.

Flight AF447 vanished from radar screens on June 1, 2009, with people from 33 nationalities on board. The black boxes ​were recovered two years ​later after a deep-sea search.

In ⁠2012, BEA crash investigators found the plane's crew had pushed their jet into a stall, chopping lift from under the wings, after mishandling a problem ​to do with iced-up sensors.

Prosecutors, however, focused their attention on alleged failures ​inside both ⁠the planemaker and the airline. Those included poor training and failing to follow up on earlier incidents.

To prove manslaughter, prosecutors needed not only to establish that the companies were guilty of negligence but to pull the threads together ⁠to demonstrate ​how this caused the crash.

Under the French system, last year's ​appeal proceedings involved a completely new trial with evidence reviewed from scratch. 

Any further appeals following Thursday's verdict will shift ​the focus from the AF447 cockpit to the intricacies of law.

-Reuters