Syria mission in limbo after veto

The future of the 300-strong United Nations observer mission in Syria was in limbo today after Russia and China again vetoed a Western-backed resolution aimed at pressuring President Bashar Assad’s government to end the escalating civil war.

The future of the 300-strong United Nations observer mission in Syria was in limbo today after Russia and China again vetoed a Western-backed resolution aimed at pressuring President Bashar Assad’s government to end the escalating civil war.

Yesterday’s latest UN Security Council deadlock sparked dire warnings of even greater bloodshed and spillover to the wider region.

The 11-2 vote, with two abstentions from South Africa and Pakistan, was the third double veto of a resolution addressing the Syria crisis, now in its 17th month, by Damascus’ most important allies.

The key stumbling block was the West’s insistence that a new resolution be drafted under Chapter 7 of the UN Charter, which could eventually allow the use of force to end the conflict, and threaten non-military sanctions against the Syrian regime if it did not withdraw troops and heavy weapons from populated areas within 10 days.

Russia’s UN ambassador Vitaly Churkin said the resolution should never have been put to a vote because the sponsors knew it had no chance of adoption.

“We simply cannot accept a document under Chapter 7, one which would open the path for the pressure of sanctions and further to external military involvement in Syrian domestic affairs,” he said.

The defeat leaves in limbo the future of the observer mission, which was forced to suspend operations because of the intensified fighting.

Its mandate, to monitor a ceasefire and implementation of international envoy Kofi Annan’s six-point peace plan, expires today.

Britain’s UN ambassador Sir Mark Lyall Grant, who sponsored the Western-backed draft, said he had circulated a new draft resolution that would extend the mission of the unarmed observers one last time, for a final 30 days.

A copy of the draft obtained by the Associated Press showed the mission would continue only if the council confirmed that Assad’s government had pulled artillery and heavy weapons back from the cities and sent his troops back to barracks.

Pakistan circulated a rival draft that would extend the mission for 45 days, with the possibility of further renewals.

After closed security council consultations last night, Mr Churkin emerged visibly upset and said the British draft was imposing political conditions on the mission’s continuation. He said Russia would oppose that and would support the Pakistani text.

Mr Churkin said he expected the council to vote on both drafts today.

Sir Mark said he was “appalled” at the third double veto of a resolution aimed at bringing an end to the violence in Syria and creating conditions for political talks.

He called Russia’s argument that the resolution would allow for military intervention “irrational”, saying Article 41 dealt only with non-military sanctions “and could not, therefore, be construed as a precursor to military intervention”.

“The consequence of their decision is obvious,” he said. “Further bloodshed, and the likelihood of descent into all-out civil war.”

US ambassador Susan Rice said history would judge the Russians and Chinese “harshly” and their vetoes at a time when the conflict was deteriorating rapidly “threatens to engulf the region in a wider war”.

France’s ambassador Gerard Araud said Russia and China must answer for the rise in casualties in Syria – 3,000 at their first veto last October, 7,000 at their second in February, and 17,000 at present.

Activists say more than 17,000 people have been killed since the uprising began in March 2011, most of them civilians.

The latest veto was a blow to Kofi Annan, the joint UN-Arab League envoy to Syria, who had called for “consequences” for non-compliance with his peace plan, which has been flouted by the Assad government.

The vote on the resolution was originally scheduled for Wednesday, but Mr Annan requested a delay and appealed to the council to unite behind a new resolution - but neither side would budge.

Mr Annan expressed disappointment through his spokesman, as did UN secretary general Ban Ki-moon, who also accused the Syrian government of failing to protect its people and pledging that with Mr Annan and the UN, he would “spare no effort” in the search to end the violence and bring about a peaceful, democratic Syrian-led transition.

The delay in Wednesday’s vote was announced shortly after the deadly bombing of a security meeting in Damascus which killed three top leaders that has made Assad’s hold on power look increasingly tenuous.

Syrian ambassador Bashar Ja’afari blamed elements from al Qaida and Arab and non-Arab jihadist and terrorist groups for the attacks.

He reiterated the Syrian government’s support for Mr Annan’s mission and a Syrian-led national dialogue.

“However, it also requires a sincere international commitment and political will from all – especially those parties that have influence on the armed groups and the armed opposition,” Mr Ja’afari said.

“Some countries are still bent on undermining any serious effort that seeks to solve the problem in Syria peacefully.”

More in this section


Select your favourite newsletters and get the best of Irish Examiner delivered to your inbox