Supreme Court go-ahead for Assange

The British High Court paved the way today for WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange to pursue his case against extradition to Sweden in the Supreme Court.

Two judges ruled that his case raised a question “of general public importance” which should be decided by the highest court in the land “as quickly as possible”.

Assange, who faces sex crime allegations, was in the London court for the ruling.

Although the judges refused Assange permission to appeal, they ruled the Supreme Court should have the last word.

The door to a fresh hearing was opened by Sir John Thomas and Mr Justice Ouseley, the judges who recently dismissed Assange's application for judicial review.

In certifying a question, the judges were giving Assange access to the Supreme Court.

He now has to ask the Supreme Court justices to hear his case.

The 40-year-old Australian argues it would be “unfair and unlawful” to order his extraditon.

The Swedish authorities want him to answer accusations of raping one woman and “sexually molesting and coercing” another in Stockholm in August last year.

Assange, whose WikiLeaks website published a mass of leaked diplomatic cables which embarrassed several governments and international businesses, denies the allegations and says they are politically motivated.

Earlier this year, the High Court upheld a ruling by District Judge Howard Riddle at Belmarsh Magistrates’ Court in south east London that the computer expert should be extradited to face investigation.