US tries to repair ties after Barack Obama criticism of David Cameron

The value of the US and UK’s special relationship has been reaffirmed in the wake of Barack Obama’s criticism of David Cameron for his actions over Libya that allowed it to become a “shit show”.

US tries to repair ties after Barack Obama criticism of David Cameron

Mr Obama has sharply criticised David Cameron for the UK’s role in allowing Libya to disintegrate after the fall of the dictator Muammar Gaddafi, in an unprecedented attack on a British leader by a serving US president.

The president was critical of European nations which joined the US in military action to prevent a massacre in Libya in 2011, but then failed to prevent the north African country becoming a “mess” in the aftermath of war.

Referring to that mess in private, Mr Obama reportedly uses the term, “shit show”.

In a lengthy interview in The Atlantic magazine, Mr Obama said Mr Cameron became “distracted” from Libya by other priorities, while he accused then French president Nicolas Sarkozy of seeking to hog the spotlight for his part in countering Gaddafi’s attempt to put down a rebellion.

But the prime minister was described as a “close partner” of Mr Obama in a statement from a US National Security Council spokesman in the wake of the interview.

“Prime Minister Cameron has been as close a partner as the president has had, and we deeply value the UK’s contributions on our shared national security and foreign policy objectives which reflect our special and essential relationship,” spokesman Edward Price told ITV News.

“With respect to Libya, the president has long said that all of us — including the US — could have done more in the aftermath of the Libyan intervention.

“More broadly, the UK has stepped up on a range of issues, including PM Cameron’s leadership within Nato in terms of meeting the 2% commitment and pressing the other members of the alliance to do so at the Wales summit.”

Mr Cameron’s spokeswoman declined to comment on private conversations between Mr Obama and the prime minister, but insisted that Britain had made efforts to help the people of Libya build a stable and peaceful future in the wake of Gaddafi’s overthrow.

“We would share the president of the United States’ assessment that there are some real challenges in Libya,” she told a regular Westminster media briefing.

“That is why we are continuing to work hard with our international partners, including the US, and through the UN to support the process in Libya that puts in place a government that can bring stability to that country.”

In the interview, Mr Obama warned Mr Cameron that the UK would have to pay its “fair share” on defence if it wanted to maintain the special relationship.

He also explained why he had decided to involve the US in military action in Libya, despite some advisers telling him that the situation was not America’s problem.

“The way I looked at it was that it would be our problem if, in fact, complete chaos and civil war broke out in Libya,” said Mr Obama. “But this is not so at the core of US interests that it makes sense for us to unilaterally strike against the Gaddafi regime.

“At that point, you’ve got Europe and a number of Gulf countries who despise Gaddafi, or are concerned on a humanitarian basis, who are calling for action. But what has been a habit over the last several decades in these circumstances is people pushing us to act but then showing an unwillingness to put any skin in the game... Free riders.

“So what I said at that point was, we should act as part of an international coalition. But because this is not at the core of our interests, we need to get a UN mandate; we need Europeans and Gulf countries to be actively involved in the coalition; we will apply the military capabilities that are unique to us, but we expect others to carry their weight.”

Mr Obama said the intervention “averted large-scale civilian casualties [and] prevented what almost surely would have been a prolonged and bloody civil conflict”. But he added: “And despite all that, Libya is a mess.”

He left no doubt that he felt blame rested with Europe over the continuing chaos in Libya.

“When I go back and I ask myself what went wrong, there’s room for criticism, because I had more faith in the Europeans, given Libya’s proximity, being invested in the follow-up,” said Mr Obama.

Mr Cameron became “distracted by a range of other things”, he said. And he said that Mr Sarkozy “wanted to trumpet the flights he was taking in the air campaign, despite the fact that we had wiped out all the air defences and essentially set up the entire infrastructure” for the intervention.

The PM’s spokeswoman said Mr Cameron had made clear many times that he still believes military intervention in Libya was “absolutely the right thing to do” and noted he had put support for the country on the agenda when the UK hosted the G8 in Northern Ireland in 2013.

More in this section


Select your favourite newsletters and get the best of Irish Examiner delivered to your inbox

Execution Time: 0.254 s