Judge to rule on class action against Donald Trump model agency

Alexia Palmer accuses Trump Model Management of lying to the federal government in its work-visa application that said she would be paid $75,000 (âŹ68,000) a year while living in the US, according to court papers.
Instead, Palmer received a total of $3,880.75 during the three years she was under contract with the agency.
The complaint alleges âfraudulent misrepresentationâ and violations of US immigration and labour laws.
It asks for $225,000 in back pay.
The suit was originally filed in October 2014.
A decision on a pending motion by Trump Model Management to dismiss is expected by the end of March, the clerk for Judge Analisa Torres, who is presiding over the case in the US District Court, Southern District, told Reuters.
If Torres rules the case can proceed, it could revive attention on Trumpâs foreign labour practices at a time when the billionaireâs rise in American politics has riveted the worldâs attention.
Trumpâs lawyers have called the case âfrivolousâ and âwithout merit.â
In court documents, they said Palmer wasnât an employee and was more than adequately compensated for a âvery brief stint as a fashion model,â which they say amounted to less than 10 days of work over three years.
â At the end of the day, this model just didnât have a successful career, and we fully expect to win,â said Lawrence Rosen, lawyer for Trump Model Management.
Although Trump owns the modelling agency, the suit does not name him. Trumpâs campaign spokeswoman, Hope Hicks, said Trump Model Managementâs treatment of Palmer was in line with âstandard practice in the modeling industryâ.
Palmerâs lawyer, Naresh Gehi, says his client was cheated of earnings and seduced by a life of glamour that never materialised.
âThe visa application the company filed with the government requires that people are paid the full amount,â Gehi said.