Genocide denied as UN publishes DR Congo report
Rwanda, whose troops are at the centre of the most serious accusations, said it categorically rejected the report after it failed to have it suppressed while Burundi said it was designed to destabilise the region.
The Democratic Republic of Congoās government said it was āappalledā by the details in the report and demanded justice for the victims.
āWhile it neither aims to establish individual responsibility, nor lay blame, the report ā in full candour ā reproduces the often shocking accounts by victims and witnesses of the tragedies they experienced,ā Navi Pillay, the UN high commissioner for human rights, said in the preface to the report.
āThe report is intended as a first step towards the sometimes painful, nonetheless essential, process of truth-telling after violent conflict,ā she added.
The report, reworded in parts after a leak, said the āapparent systematic and widespread attacks... reveal a number of inculpatory elements that, if proven before a competent court, could be characterised as crimes of genocideā, pointing in particular to attacks by Rwandan troops during 1996-1997.
āIt was not a question of people killed unintentionally in the course of combat, but people targeted primarily by AFDL (Alliance of Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Congo)/APR (Rwandan Army)/FAB (Burundi army) and executed in their hundreds,ā it added.
The Rwandan government reacted furiously, saying it ācategorically rejectedā the report.
The accusations of genocide are particularly contested by Kigali as its government has based much of its legitimacy on being the force that stopped the genocide in Rwanda in 1994.
Rwandan President Paul Kagame, who earlier dismissed the reportās claims as āabsurdā, was at the vanguard of the Rwandan force which drove the Hutu militias behind the 1994 genocide in his homeland across the border into eastern DR Congo.
The Burundi government, whose troops were also accused of abuses, said the report was aimed at ādestabilising the entire regionā.
The reportās language is, however, less assertive than in an earlier leaked draft compiled by investigators.




