BBC defends World Cup ‘experts’

The BBC has defended its choice of World Cup pundits and said viewers need to “take time” to get used to some of them.

Former Manchester United and Everton player Phil Neville has attracted the most criticism, with complaints about his lack of emotion and “monotone” style during the game between England and Italy.

But viewers have also criticised Jonathan Pearce’s commentary on the game between France and Honduras and said former Brazilian star Juninho was difficult to understand at times.

A statement on the BBC’s complaints website said some viewers had been “unhappy”.

It said: “We believe we have put together a very strong international line-up, with a wealth of experience and knowledge covering all aspects of the game at the very highest level. Thoughts on individual presenters and commentators can vary considerably so it’s inevitable some viewers or listeners will dislike or disapprove of certain presenters and commentators.

“All our programme contributors are appointed on the basis of their experience, knowledge and talent, but judgments are often subjective and we would never expect everyone to agree with every choice we make, and appreciate that sometimes it can take time for viewers and listeners to get used to a particular individual’s style of presentation or commentary.”