Mansfield CEO: Replay has been 'stolen from us' after Suarez handball
Liverpool boss Brendan Rodgers feels the onus was not on Luis Suarez to own up to the handball that helped the Reds reach the fourth round of the FA Cup.
Rodgers was at pains to point out in the wake of yesterdayâs clash at non-league Mansfield that Suarez did not deliberately handball what proved to be the all-important second goal in the 59th minute after new ÂŁ12million forward Daniel Sturridge had scored on his debut in the seventh.
Television replays, however, proved otherwise because after goalkeeper Alan Marriott saved Suarezâs left-foot shot, the Uruguayan then used his right wrist to beat the ball down over the line.
In front of the jubilant Liverpool fans, and whilst everyone within the Stags team appealed to referee Andre Marriner and his assistant, Suarez then kissed his offending wrist.
It meant Matt Greenâs 79th-minute strike proved to be a consolation rather than an equaliser that would have earned the Blue Square Bet Premier side a lucrative replay at Anfield.
Mansfield chief executive Carolyn Radford claimed her club had been robbed of a lucrative replay by Suarezâs goal.
Quoted in the Guardian, Radford said: âIâve absolutely enjoyed the day but I have to say it is a little bit like itâs been stolen from us.
âWhether itâs deliberate or not, I really do feel that it should be sorted out. We are a very good side and we put up a sterling effort. We are very proud of ourselves and itâs very unfortunate that referees and officials canât pick up these things.
âIt should be clarified and sorted out as soon as possible because obviously it wasnât in our favour and we should be going through to a replay at least.â
Given Suarezâs villainous reputation, he could arguably have redeemed himself by admitting to his obvious infraction, but Rodgers can see no reason why he should have done so.
âItâs not his job to do that,â said Rodgers, who was forced to field a barrage of questions regarding the incident and Suarez after the game.
âThe ball hit him, and it is the job of the referee to determine whether it was deliberate or not.
âThey clearly knew it had hit his hand because within a split second the fourth official had said it had hit his hand, so heâs obviously had dialogue with Andre, and he clearly felt it wasnât deliberate.
âIf it was someone else we wouldnât be discussing it to this detail, but sometimes these sorts of things will follow players.
âI only like to talk about his talent and nothing what happened in this game, the ball hitting him on the hand, is his fault.
âIf it was deemed deliberate then the referee would have disallowed the goal, but he didnât, so the goal counts.
âWe missed many more chances to put the game to bed, so we got a bit of luck there. Itâs something weâll take and move on.â
Marriott, who had a clear view of the handball given his save in the build up, described Suarezâs goal as âa sickenerâ.
âYou saw everyoneâs reaction,â said Marriott.
âTheir players didnât celebrate, and the manner in which he kicked the ball into the net afterwards suggested he thought it was going to be disallowed, but the officials missed it.
âIt happens. Itâs football, I donât think you can call him a cheat. I know a lot of people have done in the past.
âBut every man, from a Sunday League football team to the Premier League, is going to do that and if it gives you an advantage and you can get away with it, then unfortunately thatâs football.â
Town boss Paul Cox, who turned 41 yesterday two days after getting married, was more unhappy with the officials than Suarez.
âI donât want to say anything bad about him because he is a fabulous talent, and if the shoe was on the other foot then we would have taken it,â said Cox.
âBut when youâve officials at that level, you expect them to pick up on it, but they are only human.â




