All is changed, changed utterly
IRFU chief executive Philip Browne admits when the IRB decided to āopenā the game, rugby authorities here were defending the case for amateurism.
āThe IRB felt they had no choice but to either bite the bullet or potentially lose control of the game. So they took their decision for better or worse and yes, it was a difficult time because we really didnāt know what to expect.
āThere were a lot of commercial interests hovering around the game at the time, so it really was quite an uncertain period. There were various attempts to buy up and contract all the leading international players in the world and the back of that was only broken once the South Africans signed up to their union and New Zealand and Australia followed suit. Once that happened the onus was then on the authorities to provide professional structures,ā Browne recalls.
Recently retired IRFU development guru George Spottswood concurs, saying that while the IRFU had āobviously been resisting the advent of professionalismā the decision ultimately centred on issues outside their control.
āWe were against it because we didnāt have the money to run a professional game and were at a disadvantage, while also feeling the majority of players here at the time had professional careers outside the game and didnāt want to give them up.
āIn the year after the Paris decision, it was a bit like a phoney war, because people were really only gearing up to go professional the following year through the money men in England. The reality in Ireland was different especially as the club versus province debate was still in full flow.
āA lot of our players initially went to the UK to play, and while the IRFU did then decide to make the provinces the second tier of the game here, the truth was initially we didnāt have the money to pay for four professional squads. Television money generated subsequently through the arrival of Sky proved crucial though, and the subsequent invention of the Celtic League gave those squads a full season with their provinces. Ultimately, the clubs did not have the sort of financial backers to swing the decision in their favour.ā
Mr Browne says the Union had to learn a lot in a short period of time - and reckons they are still learning - but thinks the ultimate prognosis on professionalism here has been positive.
āBut that does not underestimate the difficulties we have as a small playing race with a large cost base and there are real challenges out there for us. Having said that, there is huge interest in the game which was not there to the same extent before, and while we have attracted many new players at youth and underage level, the challenge now is to translate that into the adult code.
āThe model which seems to work best in world rugby right now is the provincial one. All told I think there are more positives than negative to be drawn from the ten years. The glass is definitely half-full; the profile of the game has never been higher, the Irish team has never been as consistent, but there are still many challenges ahead.ā
RESISTANCE to the official IRFU line on professionalism comes no more vigorously than from former Garryowen kingpin Frank Hogan.
āThe majority of players now donāt get any recognition until they are 23 or 24,ā he says. āThe net result is the formative years of their rugby lives are involved playing mickey mouse average matches with average players who canāt teach them. I learned how to play rugby from more experienced players than me.
āThe guy who is any good now is gone from the club, and I cannot see how he is going to become a good player without playing and training week-in, week-out with guys who will educate him. It is a shambles. The clubs havenāt a shilling and people are walking away from it. OK, so thousands of people are going to rugby matches, but those who are the lifeblood of the game are not comfortable with it.ā
He admits the natural competitiveness of the scene in Limerick has kept the game āpretty aliveā at club level there, but insists clubs who were traditionally very strong are all weak and the standard of rugby being played is āterrible.ā
āNobody goes to the AIL finals, nobody cares about the Munster Senior Cup, and if I was asked āis that good for the game,ā then Iād have to say it canāt be. Look at the amount of young players going to England. Why is that? Well, I believe it is because they cannot get quality football here.
āTen years on and Iām terribly disappointed we have not won a European Cup. Largely the clubs have been gutted and the only ones doing well are the junior clubs. I donāt think thatās progress and if I was running my business like that, Iād be broke years ago.ā
AT the age of 28 in 1995, Michael Galwey did not know if professional rugby was going to impact greatly on him. But the Shannon and Munster legend soon found out his sport would not only give him a new lease of life, but also a full-time and long-term career.
āIn the start everyone wanted to know how it was going to work - it was something so new for all of us - but it worked out well in the end and the game has gone from strength to strength at every level,ā he said.
In 1995 there was an exodus of Irish players to England. Galwey had offers but is glad he didnāt move. āThere was a point where unless you were playing in England, it was hard to be selected for Ireland. But Iām glad we adapted to the professional game, because otherwise it could be like soccer, where all our top players play abroad and not at home. It may happen down the road that weāll lose some of our high profile players to England or France to play out their career, but so far we have not lost any. The players at their peak now want to play in Ireland and thatās good.
āProfessionalism was the best thing that happened me, and Iām delighted I had the experience. We played for the love of it, but to get paid for your passion is fantastic. āIām glad I experienced both eras, because I can appreciate both equally.ā
KIWI Brent Pope arrived here in 1991, well ahead of professionalism, but at that time the game - particularly in the Southern Hemisphere - had more to do with āshamateurismā than any Corinthian ideal.
āA lot of the guys I played with who were either All Blacks or going on to be, were professional rugby players before it was official,ā he recalls. āIn the lead up to it at home there was a lot going on with television bosses and I think that forced the hand of the IRB in the end.
āIronically, the Irish were probably dragged kicking and screaming into it, but if you look back and see the way Irish rugby has gone, youād have to say it was a good move. They certainly made the transition better than other home unions.ā
Of the club/province argument, Pope agrees that, like in New Zealand, Irish clubs have suffered. He admits the 25,000 strong crowd that watched Young Munster and St. Maryās in 1993 may be a thing of the past.
āIt is very difficult to generate interest in the club game anymore for young players and thatās a shame. But the other side of that is how the junior clubs have come on because they are now getting a lot of players who didnāt make it at inter-provincial level and decide to go back to their home teams. It is those teams who are now making real progress.
āIn New Zealand a lot of country clubs are now thriving once again because, letās say, there are a lot of farmerās sons who go to the big city to try and make it in a Super 12 or interprovincial outfit, but do not. So at the age of 26 or so, they decide āHey, Iāve a dairy farm to run and Iām off homeā.ā
Pope reckons professionalism has worked better here than he envisaged. āIf youād have asked me beforehand, Iād have said Ireland would struggle. But I think theyāve really got their structures right, bringing players home from England was a masterstroke. The thing now is keeping everyone happy - and as weāve seen with Shane Jennings and Leo Cullen going to Leicester, that may not always be possible. Money talks and players walk.ā
IT soon dawned on the powers-that-be that it needed to pay the top referees and make them full-time. One of Irelandās top exponents, Dave McHugh, says that was no bad thing.
āThere are a number of obvious advantages - you get more time to prepare and you donāt have to worry about an employer giving you permission to travel anywhere. The other side is that if you do have a job, it gives you another focus in your life, because as a full-time referee, you spend a lot of time on your own and a lot of time away from home.
āIt is probably more of a commitment than the players have to make, because at the top level you could be away from home for over 200 days a year. Having said that it is hugely rewarding and being a professional referee is a great job. Look at the quality of the games now as opposed to ten years ago. The ball in play time, the number of tackles - all that stuff has increased dramatically. It is also a much faster game, much more physical. The athletes involved are of Olympic class standard and that could not have happened in the amateur era.ā





