Referee: Harrington disqualification 'does not fit crime'
Martin Kaymer is on course to retain the Abu Dhabi HSBC Championship and take the world number two spot off Tiger Woods after a scintillating second-round 65 today.
But that was not the story of the day in the desert. Padraig Harringtonās disqualification when lying in second place was the big talking point ā and it might lead to a change in the rules of golf.
Even the referee who called the three-time major winner in to study a slow-motion video of him replacing his ball on the seventh green in his opening 65 said that the punishment did not fit the crime.
In the week that Scot Elliot Saltman was given a three-month ban after being accused of repeatedly moving his ball forward after marking it, there was no suggestion of Harrington trying to gain an advantage.
But the fact that his ball was deemed to have been accidentally nudged a tiny fraction of an inch was enough to put him out of the £1.7m event.
Harrington, who would have received only a two-stroke penalty if the incident had come to light before he signed his scorecard, said: āIt seems harsh ā it feels harsh.
āBut the rule is there for other and bigger reasons and we love the fact that we have the best game in the world when it comes to the rules.
āItās an absolute game of honour and even if a player is seen to breach rules and canāt be caught out by the officials he would be ostracised and have a very lonely life on the Tour.
āIt gives us the higher ground, letās say.
āItās a dimple and a half today, half an inch tomorrow, an inch next week and then five inches the following week. If itās moved, itās moved ā thatās the fact of the matter and you canāt argue over how much itās moved.ā
A television viewer raised the matter of Harringtonās ball rocking forward and then rolling back as he brushed it with a finger while picking up his marker.
Only when the coverage was slowed down could European Tour senior referee Andy McFee be sure that the movement back was not as much.
And because Harrington had signed his card by then, disqualification was the only outcome as the rules stand.
Yet the European Tour wrote to the ruling Royal and Ancient Club three years ago on whether that was too severe a penalty in such circumstances and discussions on whether it needs to be changed are still ongoing.
Europeās senior referee Andy McFee is the man who gave Harrington the bad news today and also disqualified him when he was five ahead with a round to go at The Belfry in 2000. The Dubliner was discovered on that occasion to have failed to sign his scorecard on the opening day.
āIt is very harsh ā the punishment does not really fit what the player has done,ā he said. āThatās unfortunate.
āItās something the PGA Tour and ourselves have raised with the governing bodies (the rules in America and Mexico are governed by the United States Golf association) and as yet we have not put forward an argument that has convinced them.ā
Grant Moir, Rules of Golf director for the R&A, told Press Association Sport: āObviously in the light of this and what happened to Camilo Villegas (the Colombian was another victim of ātrial by televisionā in Hawaii earlier this month) the significance of the disqualification penalty has been brought sharply back into focus.
āCertainly with the introduction of every-increasing scrutiny and enhanced images there is a fresh impetus to have a look at it and see if the rules are still appropriate.ā







