Incorrect drop debate rages on
If Woods fails to win a 15th major, and first since the 2008 US Open, the controversy will eventually die down, but a victory for the 37-year-old will ensure it remains a divisive issue.
Fred Ridley, Competition Committees at Augusta chairman admits he wished he had told Woods his drop had been under scrutiny, while former US Open champion Lucas Glover explained how such incidents are usually handled by officials in regular tour events.
âAny times thereâs an outstanding issue that could have come up from a ruling, theyâll wait for you and say âSorry, donât sign your card, letâs talk about it,ââ Glover said. âTheyâll do everything they can to keep you from signing your card if thereâs an infraction that a rules official didnât witness or that a question came up.â
Steve Stricker also pointed the finger at tournament officials, adding: âI think if they would have come up to him before he signed his card, he would have said âOkay, letâs go through it and youâre right, I did take two steps back, itâs a two-shot penalty and signed for two shots higher, end of story.â But I think the way it all played out, all in all they got it right. No doubt he (Woods) didnât think he was violating the rules by any means and thatâs what makes our sport unique and difficult to understand all at the same time.â
2012 winner Bubba Watson said he was in favour of rule 33-7 after twice being involved in rules debates prompted by viewers pointing out possible infractions. âI think the rule is great because it should protect us,â Watson said.
âWhen somebody calls in like that, it shouldnât be allowed. Nobody calls in during a basketball game or a football game. You can make it (a phone call) and put bad press on somebody. All it takes is one person and bad press gets on you. When I won at Torrey Pines in 2011, somebody called in the Monday after and said that I improved my lie on 17 behind the green, when I never grounded my club. Itâs probably just someone that hates Bubba Watson.â







