Letters to the Editor: Two-tier cancer care is inequitable

A doctor responds to 'Irish Examiner' Health Correspondent Niamh Griffin's recent articles about uninsured patients' lack of access to the latest cancer drugs
Letters to the Editor: Two-tier cancer care is inequitable

OECD research dating back to 2004 shows that private health insurance is the single largest contributor to inequity of access to healthcare. Picture: Courtneyk/iStock

Irish Examiner Health Correspondent Niamh Griffin reports comments by oncologist Dr Michael McCarthy that he has been asking his patients at University Hospital Galway if they had private health insurance, as patients with such insurance can now immediately access new cancer drugs, while public patients may have to wait two years for this treatment — ‘Two-tier access to cancer meds’ (Irish Examiner, March 30). 

He was concerned about the development of a two-tier system in cancer care which in fact has been present for some time given a report by Irish Cancer Society head of services and advocacy Donal Buggy — 'ICS: Ireland now has two tier cancer care' (Irish Examiner, April 26, 2016). 

Sadly, this development follows in the steps of our two-tier system of hospital care for most health services since the introduction of private health insurance back in 1957.

General practitioners are used to such two-tier hospital care and are relieved when patients tell them they have private health insurance as it means quicker access to hospital diagnostics and care.

Indeed, this inequity was found in a 2004 report by the OECD’s health equity research group of 21 OECD countries that found Ireland had the third most inequitable hospital system of the 21 countries studied. Holland had the most equitable. 

The OECD researchers found that private health insurance was the single largest contributor to this inequity of access. The 2011 Fine Gael/Labour government proposed a universal health insurance system for all that would have substantially removed this inequity. 

Unfortunately, a less than critically appraised ESRI report for the Department of Health somehow convinced the minister for health at the time, Leo Varadkar, to dispense with the former minister for health, James Reilly’s, proposals for equitable access to care.

A political leader with excellent leadership qualities would be required to implement the introduction of universal health insurance and rid us of our two-tier hospital system, previously described by Professor Sara  Burke of Trinity College, in her book on inequality in Irish health care, as Irish apartheid. 

Unfortunately, for all its potential, Sláintecare cannot achieve this as the plan leaves private health insurance in place as a funding model of our hospital care,

Dr John Barton, Ballymoneen Road, Galway

Cigarette littering

With the 20th anniversary of the smoking ban, most publicity has been dedicated to the positive benefits to derive from the the prohibition on smoking in public places. 

While I was and remain an advocate of the above legislation I am equally at a loss that back in 2004 when the legislation was enacted that subsidiary legislation was not also introduced simultaneously to tackle the obvious implications the prohibition of smoking in public places has had on society.

With the concept of the simple ashtray in public places disappearing and not replaced by cigarette receptacles, we now have the litter problem where smokers on entering all public buildings drop cigarette butts on the ground. 

As one on regular litter patrol I can confirm from personal experience that more than 60% of the items I remove are cigarette butts.

As a result of successive governments for the last 20 years failing to introduce the desired legislation, I have received the deaf ear to my appeals to Cork County Council to introduce a scheme, where on request from ratepayers, the local authority would provide cigarette receptacles outside the relevant premises for obvious reasons. 

Finally, considering the amount of lip service paid by all government departments to the issue of litter, would it be too much to expect that the above bureaucrats would ensure that all state buildings accessible to the public would have a cigarette receptacle outside same?

Tadhg O’Donovan, Fermoy, Co Cork

Hate speech bill

This so-called hate speech bill needs to be scrapped as it is flawed — 'Mick Clifford: Hate speech bill in danger of failing due to noise around relatively minor element' (Irish Examiner, April 4). 

Mr Clifford argues that it is in danger of failing because of noise around a very minor element is valid. But the noise is justified and it calls out serious flaws: Flawed law is poor law and can never be justified.

As it stands, the potential in this bill to attack and undermine freedom of speech is a far too risky and dangerous potential to accept.

The very small risk that it could introduce the notion of a “thought crime” is still a risk and therefore a hazard that needs to be eliminated.

To eliminate the hazard we need to eliminate the bill.

Michael Dineen, via email

Reproductive rights violated in Palestine

What’s happening in Palestine is a violation of reproductive rights.

We write as a group of academics and activists whose work is committed to advancing reproductive rights and justice.

On January 26, the International Court of Justice recognised the plausibility of genocide being committed by the Israeli State in Gaza. 

To date, this has resulted in the murder of more than 30,000 Palestinians since October 7. This is an escalation of violence towards Palestinian people which has been ongoing for over 75 years and is rooted in the settler colonial occupation of Palestine by Israel.

The ongoing occupation has had severe implications for the health of Palestinian people, including the systematic infringement of sexual and reproductive rights which we recognise as a calculated policy by the Israeli State to deal with the ‘demographic threat’ of any potential growth in the Palestinian population; viewed as a threat to the expansion of the settler colonial regime.

Prior to the escalation of violence on October 7, the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) reported that there were approximately 94,000 Palestinian women whose access to reproductive health services was restricted. In 2007, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights released a report on ‘The issue of Palestinian pregnant women giving birth at Israeli checkpoints’ which detailed how restrictions placed on the movement of Palestinian citizens by the Israeli State led to unpredictable access to maternity services, resulting in complications due to late arrivals to hospitals after delays at checkpoints and undue stress being placed on pregnant people and their families. These are just some examples of the myriad ways in which reproductive violence has been perpetrated against Palestinian people due to policies and laws implemented by the Israeli State.

Since October 7 however, the actions of the Israeli State have had increasingly devastating consequences for the Palestinian people, in particular the decimation of health infrastructure which violates the basic human right of access to healthcare. 

The International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF) have reported that hospitals and health centres providing sexual and reproductive health care in Gaza have been damaged or destroyed, including the centre run by the Palestinian Family Planning Association. 

These actions will have potentially life-threatening implications for Palestinian women and people who need to access maternity services. There are currently 50,000 pregnant people in Gaza, who will be forced to give birth without necessary medical care, including anaesthetic for C-section procedures. Instances of stress-induced miscarriages, stillbirths, and premature births are increasing and the systematic starvation of the people of Palestine implemented as a war crime by Israel will create further complications and difficulties for women who are pregnant or breastfeeding. 

In addition to maternal health concerns, the lack of period products for those who are menstruating create health and hygiene concerns, and a lack of access to contraception increases the likelihood of unintended pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections (STIs).

Therefore, we feel it is imperative to frame the ongoing genocide as a reproductive justice issue and an intersectional feminist issue. Access to sexual and reproductive health and rights, including the right to have children or not, to determine the number and spacing of those children, and to parent those children in a safe and healthy environment are crucial to the liberation of the Palestinian people.

Academics for Reproductive Justice

Dr Kate Antosik-Parsons, Trinity College Dublin; Dr Catherine Baker, Dublin City University; Dr Erika Biagini, Assistant Professor in Security Studies, DCU; Dr Fiona Bloomer, Ulster University; Dr Emma Campbell, Ulster University;
Dr Mercedes Carbayo Abengozar, Maynooth University; Richael Carroll, Mayo Pro Choice; Dr Dyuti Chakravarty, University College Cork; Dr Pauline Cullen, Maynooth University;
Dr Jenny Dagg; Dr Dilara Demir Bloom, lecturer in Maynooth University; Dr Camilla Fitzsimons, Maynooth University; Dr Ruth Fletcher, Queen Mary University of London; Dr Katherine Fama; Dr Oona Frawley, Maynooth University; Dr Catherine Gander, Maynooth University;
Dr Lorraine Grimes, Maynooth University;
Dr Sinead Kennedy, Maynooth University;
Dr Mary McAuliffe, UCD; Brenda Mondragon Toledo, UCC; Dr Naoise Murphy, Maynooth University; Dr Maeve O’Brien; Dr Aileen
O’Carroll, Maynooth University; Dr Theresa O’Keefe, UCC; Dr Aideen O’Shaughnessy,
University of Lincoln; Dr Meg Ryan,
Assistant Professor in Global Health, TCD;
Dr Karen Till, Maynooth University; Dr Rory Rowan, Trinity College Dublin; Dr Rita Sakr, Maynooth University; Dr Paola Rivetti, Dublin City University; Dr Ailbhe Smyth UCD (Retired)

     

     

     

More in this section

Revoiced

Newsletter

Sign up to the best reads of the week from irishexaminer.com selected just for you.

Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited