Letters to the Editor: Mother and baby homes not patriarchal, but Victorian

Letters to the Editor: Mother and baby homes not patriarchal, but Victorian

Artworks at the grotto on an unmarked mass grave at the site of the Tuam Mother and Baby Home. Picture: Niall Carson/PA Wire

Aoife Moore is partially right that the mother and baby homes ‘were never about sin at all’ (Where are the men? Irish Examiner, January 16). It would be revisionist to claim that, at the time, there wasn’t a widespread view — largely absent today — that sex outside marriage was sinful and shameful.

However, telling us it all boils down to patriarchy is equally reductionist and simplistic. Certainly, the fathers had broken social rules, or “sinned”, too, but the women’s pregnancies and resulting children were the most visible, incontrovertible evidence; and it was this evidence that the society wished to hide.

You have reached your article limit. Already a subscriber? Sign in

Unlimited access starts here.

Try from only €0.25 a day.

Cancel anytime

More in this section

Revoiced

Newsletter

Had a busy week? Sign up for some of the best reads from the week gone by. Selected just for you.

Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited